Austin mayor's watery claim
By W. Gardner Selby
Published on Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013 at 12:12 p.m.
Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell lofted a point that caught the ear of Bill Bunch, executive director of the Save Our Springs Alliance, who urged us to check it out.
We like it when readers ask us to poke into claims.
Mayor Leffingwell reminded colleagues at a Dec. 13, 2012, Austin City Council meeting that Austin get its water from the Colorado River and puts its treated wastewater into the river,
Yuck? "Actually, it’s not as bad as it sounds," Leffingwell said, "because it’s better quality than the water we take out of Lake Austin" for public use. "It’s treated to a high level."
Half True, we concluded after soliciting research on water upstream, downstream and in the effluent put into the river by the Austin Water Utility.
Some indicators suggest the river below Austin is of higher quality for aquatic life than the water in Lake Austin.
But other measurements suggest higher downstream levels of nitrogen and phosphorus.
And separately, the state’s analysis was that some elements of the effluent from the wastewater plants are better, some worse.
Hizzoner’s claim ultimately struck us as oversimplifying a judgment dependent on which of many possible quality indicators is considered significant.
See Truth-O-Meter article.
Researchers: W. Gardner Selby
Names in this article: Lee Leffingwell
We want to hear your suggestions and comments. Email the Texas Truth-O-Meter with feedback and with claims you'd like to see checked. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.