Monday, December 22nd, 2014

Statements about Legal Issues

Mostly False

Only until “flagged” signatures can be reviewed

Mostly False

Harder for lawyers, but on both sides of the cases

Pants on Fire!

Judge says Kloppenburg didn’t ask for jail time. He ordered it — eventually — for contempt of court

Pants on Fire!

Umm. We remember the original ruling as Barely True

Pants on Fire!

Some of the many other types of cases were argued at the high court in front of Prosser himself

Mostly False

Ad suggests Prosser knew at the time information that surfaced years later

Mostly False

Candidate points only to general statements, no specific cases or issues

Mostly False

Unprecedented departure stymied action, but GOP had the tools to break the logjam. And did.

Mostly True

On the money with most, but off a bit with some contract plumbers

False

Surveys show it was on the radar screen, but just a blip compared with other priorities

False

The main study cited actually shows the opposite.

False

What about that criminal investigation and pressure on Kratz to turn himself in to regulators?