Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.

Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.

More Info

I would like to contribute

By Robert Farley September 28, 2009

E-mail claims Democratic Congress to blame for no COLA increase in Social Security

So every year you've gotten a little bump in your Social Security check due to inflation. Maybe you've come to consider it an annual raise from Uncle Sam.

Well, this January, you might not get one.

And a chain e-mail making the rounds tells you to blame Democrats in Congress.

"For the first time in history, the Democratic Congress will not allow an increase in the Social Security COLA (cost of living adjustment)," the e-mail states.

There are actually two versions of this e-mail floating around. One pins the blame generically on "Congress," while the other says "the Democratic Congress." The second version seems to have gotten more traction on the Web, so we focused on the latter version.

Up until 1975, it took an act of Congress to adjust Social Security payments for inflation. But a law enacted in 1972 — and signed by President Richard Nixon, a Republican — created a formula to automatically calculate the COLA every year. The Social Security cost of living adjustment was tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

The government compares that index in the third quarter (July, August and September) of the current year to the third quarter of the previous year. Every year since the formula was put into effect (1975), it has resulted in a cost-of-living increase . High oil prices last summer contributed in large part to a sizable COLA increase in January of 5.8 percent , the highest increase in more than 25 years.

Featured Fact-check

This year, the CPI-W is expected to decrease. That's due in part to lower consumer prices and low inflation from the recession. But mostly, it's tied to oil prices, which fell markedly from last summer's highs. As a result, a Social Security Trustees report last fall forecast no COLA next year. And the Congressional Budget Office recently projected that the formula will fail to yield a COLA in 2010 or 2011.

The law does not allow COLA to be adjusted downward , so the effect is that Social Security payments would remain stagnant next year. This all has consequences for Medicare as well. For the three-quarters of seniors who have premiums for Part B of Medicare withheld from their Social Security checks, the COLA freeze will also mean a freeze in Part B premiums. That's because of a "hold-harmless" provision in the law. But millions of seniors exempt from the provision — some wealthy people, people new to the program and those who don't have Part B premiums withheld from their Social Security payments — could actually see smaller Social Security checks.

"It has nothing to do with Democrats or Republicans," said Mark Hinkle, a spokesman for Social Security. "It's been the law since 1975, and it's based strictly on the numbers."

Congress could vote to increase Social Security payments even though the COLA formula doesn't call for it. And, in fact, several pieces of legislation have been offered with that very goal.

One is the Emergency Senior Citizens Relief Act, introduced in the Senate by Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and in the House by Peter DeFazio, D-Ore. It would provide a one-time payment of $250 to Social Security recipients next year.

Another is the Emergency COLA Bill, introduced earlier this week by Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C. It would provide a COLA for 2010 equal to the average of the COLA over the past 10 years — roughly 3 percent.

Obviously, these bills are coming from both sides of the aisle.

If this e-mail had merely gotten some facts wrong, we'd be comfortable rating it False. But given that it targets senior citizens on an important pocketbook issue with an incorrect allegation that has no basis in fact, we have to go one more notch and set the meter ablaze. Pants on Fire.

Our Sources

Social Security Online, Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA)

Social Security Online, Social Security Cost-Of-Living Adjustments by year

Social Security Online, Automatic Increases: Latest Cost-of-Living Adjustment

Social Security Online, Cost-of-Living Adjustment Must Be Greater Than Zero

Social Security Online, The History of COLA, Fact Sheet: Social Security History of Automatic Cost-Of-Living Adjustments

Social Security Online, Social Security Announces 5.8 Percent Benefit Increase for 2009

Social Security Online, A Summary of the 2009 Annual Reports, Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees

New York Times, "Social Security Benefits Not Expected to Rise in '10," by Robert Pear, May 2, 2009

AP, "Millions face shrinking Social Security payments," by Stephen Ohlemacher, Aug. 23, 2009

Energy Information Administration, Weekly All Countries Spot Price FOB Weighted by Estimated Export Volume (Dollar per Barrell)

AARP Bulletin, "Part B Premiums in 2010: Frozen for Many, Higher for Some," by Patricia Barry, May 7, 2009

Congressional Budget Office, Effect of a Zero Social Security COLA on Part B Premiums in Medicare

FactCheck.org, "Social Security COLA," by Brooks Jackson, Sept. 23, 2009

Chicago Tribune, "Seniors rate on Social Security raise; Federal formula shows no boost warranted, but Congress may be tilting toward an exception," by Greg Burns, Sept. 24, 2009

Congressional Quarterly, "Democrats Seek To Avert Big Medicare Premium Increase for Some Seniors," by David Clarke, Sept. 23, 2009

Interview with Mark Hinkle, a spokesman for Social Security, Sept. 28, 2009

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Robert Farley

E-mail claims Democratic Congress to blame for no COLA increase in Social Security

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up