Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
The long-running Senate battle between Democrats and Republicans over the filibuster and delays in processing President Barack Obama’s nominations came to the brink this past week.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., threatened to use the so-called nuclear option and set aside the 60-vote majority needed to close debate and bring a nomination to the floor. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said if Reid did that, he was "going to be remembered as the worst leader of the Senate ever."
The two sides healed the breach after many urgent phone calls and a meeting of every senator in the Old Senate Chamber, a room one lawmaker called "hallowed ground."
But before the return to relative civility, McConnell had been on NBC’s Meet the Press where he argued that the president had done pretty well for himself. "What is the problem here?" McConnell asked. "The president has had 1,540 of his nominations confirmed, only four defeated."
McConnell’s office said he meant to say 1,560. We checked, and he did use the correct number just three days earlier. We also looked at the Library of Congress nominations database for Obama’s first and second terms and confirmed McConnell’s numbers.
But what drew our attention was McConnell’s claim that only four had been defeated. That number refers to people who failed on a measure to end debate (called "cloture) and send their names to the floor for a simple majority vote. It takes 60 votes to end debate.
McConnell’s list includes Craig Becker (National Labor Relations Board), Caitlin Joan Halligan (U.S. Circuit judge), Goodwin Liu (U.S. Circuit judge), and Richard Cordray (director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection).
However, that doesn’t account for many of the people Obama put forward who have withdrawn due to opposition from Senate Republicans.
"McConnell is using misleading numbers," said Ian Ostrander, a political scientist at Texas Tech University. "He’s taking advantage of the fact that very few nominations actually fail through a direct vote."
There are many ways to stymie a nomination. There is the threat of filibuster which requires clearing the 60-vote majority to end debate.
Alternatively, opponents can run out the clock and return the nomination to the White House with no vote at all, generally right before the summer recess or at the end of the year.
Or an individual senator, anonymously or publicly, can place a hold and block a nomination from moving forward.
Ostrander said that the White House might withdraw a nomination, or never put someone’s name forward if minority opposition seems too strong. He cited the examples of Susan Rice, Obama’s first choice for Secretary of State, and Elizabeth Warren, his first pick to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Neither was ever formally nominated.
Republicans didn’t like key aspects of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in the first place. In May 2011, 44 GOP senators sent a letter to the administration saying they "will not support the consideration of any nominee, regardless of party affiliation" until changes were made. When Obama replaced Warren with Richard Cordray, it made no difference in the Republican position.
Cordray was the first stalled nominee to win confirmation immediately after the deal that averted the crisis in the Senate.
Occasionally, Ostrander said, the nominee on their own steps back due to long delays. He put Federal Reserve Board nominee Peter Diamond in this category. Diamond, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, was nominated three times. Twice in 2010, the Senate did not reject him; it simply made no decision and returned the nomination to the White House.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., worked hard against the nomination and never backed down. The White House nominated Diamond a third time in June 2011, but he withdrew saying he saw that his name would never make it to the Senate floor.
Ostrander has studied more than two decades of non-judicial nominations. His doctoral thesis: Winning the Waiting Game: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations.
Ostrander has detailed at what point nominations failed in the nomination process: 84 percent stalled or were withdrawn before going before a committee. Another 0.03 percent were rejected by a committee vote, while 0.01 percent were rejected in a floor vote.
"McConnell is choosing to count as failures cases that only account for a small fraction of overall failures," Ostrander said.
Overall, 69 of Obama’s nominees withdrew for any reason since 2009. During the first term, Ostrander said he counts 38 who likely pulled out under pressure from Republican opposition.
We reviewed in detail 12 instances (beyond McConnell’s four) where nominees withdrew after encountering opposition, either to their specific background or to Obama’s policies. Those include Donald Berwick to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Erroll Southers to lead for the Transportation Security Administration, Michael Mundaca for the Treasury Department’s Office of Tax Policy, and Dawn Johnsen to be assistant attorney general, among others.
There is an additional issue with McConnell’s measure of Obama’s success rate. We contacted five other political scientists, and they agreed that McConnell’s statement overlooked the impact of delayed nominations even if they ultimately win confirmation.
In the book Defending the Filibuster: The Soul of the Senate, Richard A. Arenberg and Robert B. Dove said the filibuster is a moderating force and a check on executive power. We asked Arenberg if McConnell’s point about the president’s track record on confirmations was valid.
"Clearly, it's not only the final outcome that matters," Arenberg said. "Delay in confirmation can certainly hamper an executive agency."
Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law, has studied the nomination process. "The problem is not just the delays; it is the limited authority of an acting or temporary head," Gerhardt said. "Here, the statistics might not accurately capture the harm done to the executive branch."
McConnell said Obama faced no real problems getting his nominees confirmed by the Senate, saying that only four of 1,540 nominations had been defeated. His office later said he misspoke and the number should have been 1,560.
We find he's partially accurate but is leaving out some important details. Yes, it's true that when nominations reach a final vote, the vast majority have been approved by the Senate. But this accounting ignores those who withdrew before a vote, including the estimated 38 who withdrew after Republican opposition. It also does not account for high-profile figures such as Susan Rice who were never nominated because of opposition.
We rate the claim Half True.
NBC News, Meet the Press, July 14, 2013
Email interview with Michael Burmas, communications director for Sen Mitch McConnell, July 18, 2013
U.S. Senate, Virtual Reference Desk: Cloture
Politico, Harry Reid-Mitch McConnell relationship hits new low, July 14, 2013
Congressional Record, Senate procedural matters, July 11, 2013
Congressional Record, Senate legislative action, July 11, 2013
PolitiFact, Barack Obama says his judicial nominees have faced waits three times as long as George W. Bush's, June 4, 2013
PolitiFact, John Cornyn says move to delay Hagel nomination is "not a filibuster", February 18, 2013
U.S. Senate, Nominations overview
Email interview with Ian Ostrander assistant professor, Department of Political Science
Texas Tech University, July 18, 2013
Washington University in St. Louis, Winning the Waiting Game: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations, August 2013
Email interview with Richard Arenberg, author of Defending the Filibuster, , July 18, 2013
Email interview with Sarah Binder, professor of political science, George Washington University, July 18, 2013
Email interview with Michael Gerhardt, law professor, University of North Carolina School of Law, July 17, 2013
Email interview with Anne Joseph O’Connell, July 18, 2013
Politico, GOP is unrelenting on Fed nominee, March 8, 2011
The Atlantic Wire, Peter Diamond withdraws Fed nomination over GOP block, June 6, 2011
New York Times, When a Nobel prize isn’t enough, June 5, 2011
The Monkey Cage, If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck….Thoughts on the Hagel filibuster, February 14, 2013
CNN Money, Republicans: Change Consumer Bureau ... or else, May 9, 2011
Library of Congress, Nominations database, July 18, 2013
CQ Weekly, Paul M. Tiao, June 8, 2013
The Fiscal Times, Key tax policy post languishes in the senate, March 4, 2010
New York Times, Obama’s pick to head Medicare and Medicaid resigns post, November 23, 2011
Times Picayune, Nominee put on hold by Sen. David Vitter withdraws, January 28, 2012
Thompson Information Services, Obama withdraws his second nominee for wage and hour administrator, August 4, 2011
National Legal and Policy Center, If Obama is pro-business, he should withdraw wage and hour division nominee Leon Rodriguez, December 17, 2010
Cnsnews.com, Obama renominates Dawn Elizabeth Johnsen but Republicans say her pro-abortion views disqualify her for DoJ post, January 25, 2010
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing March 30, 2011
Washington Post, Erroll G. Southers
New York Times, Obama choice for Labor post advances but then meets a G.O.P. roadblock, October 7, 2009
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.