Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.

Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Amy Sherman
By Amy Sherman August 15, 2014

NextGen ad says Rick Scott takes money from a company that pollutes

California billionaire Tom Steyer’s NextGen Climate group unleashed an ad that accuses Gov. Rick Scott of being cozy with a polluter.

"A dangerous new type of oil drilling near the Everglades threatened drinking water for 7 million Floridians," states part of the ad. "But one Floridian is benefitting. Rick Scott drank from a fountain of campaign cash from the company that profited off pollution."

The text on the screen states: "Rick Scott $200,000 from oil interests."

Scott’s side refuted the ad and the Republican Party of Florida counter-punched with its own TV ad: "Crist’s team says Gov. Scott took contributions from this polluter. It’s total fiction. Scott didn’t take a nickel. Scott held the polluter accountable. Shut down their wells...."

Did Scott, who is facing re-election, take campaign cash from a "company that profited off pollution" and receive $200,000 from oil interests? We decided to drill down to sort out the facts.

Controversial drilling project led state to sue

When we dug into the ad, we found a very complicated backstory. The ad’s makers told us the contributions refer to Collier Resources Co., but the story really begins with a separate company: Dan A. Hughes Co.

In June 2012, Collier leased about 120,000 acres of mineral rights to Hughes. A few months later Hughes received a state permit to construct its first exploratory well.

The public outcry began when Hughes sought additional permits the next year. Residents received a letter in April 2013 from a Hughes subcontractor asking for information needed to draw up an evacuation plan in case of an explosion.

Despite residents’ protests, in September 2013, DEP granted Hughes a permit to inject acid deep underground to fracture the limestone. The process is similar to hydraulic fracking, which has been the subject of heated debate across the country, although the industry term for it is "acid stimulation."

Hughes also wanted to try something never before allowed in Florida. After injecting the acid, Hughes workers injected a mix of sand and chemical gel under pressure to prop open the new fractures and let the oil flow out. That's known as using a "proppant," and it was not covered by the DEP permit, the Tampa Bay Times reported.

In December 2013, Hughes told DEP that it intended to start that operation in a few days. The DEP sought a short delay to review the plan, but then Hughes did it anyway.

That led DEP to fine Hughes $25,000 in April and order Hughes to hire an expert to monitor groundwater for contamination. After months of wrangling, the state said Hughes failed to meet the terms of the consent order, yanked the company’s permits and filed a lawsuit. Collier and Hughes agreed to terminate the lease, and Hughes announced that it was pulling out of Florida.

DEP conducted groundwater sampling and found no contamination, but environmentalists say more extensive testing is needed.

"Hughes is not a ‘polluter’ nor has it turned a profit on the well, which the company unilaterally shut-in due to the controversy," Hughes spokesman David Blackmon said.

There was, however, an entity that "profited" -- though we can’t say they "profited from pollution": the Collier Resources Co. that leased the land to Hughes. Blackmon told PolitiFact Florida that Hughes will not be reimbursed for the terminated lease. 

Campaign contributions

The ad doesn’t identify the campaign donors or company when it states that "Rick Scott drank from a fountain of campaign cash from the company that profited off pollution."

For those following the controversy, it would be easy to wrongly assume the ad referred to donations from Hughes.

But Hughes "has not contributed to the Crist or Scott campaigns and does not intend to," Blackmon said.

Instead, NextGen is referring to four members of the Collier family -- Barron, Miles, Parker and Thomas -- who each gave $50,000 to Scott’s Let’s Get to Work Committee in January 2013. PolitiFact Florida verified those donations on the state elections website.

We asked a Collier representative why the individuals donated to Scott, but the answer didn’t shed much light.

"Certain individual owners have personally supported the Governor in the past, but those decisions are made individually and without any input from Collier Resources Company," said Priscylla M. Oliva, executive assistant to Barron Collier Companies, in an email to PolitiFact Florida.

The Collier family has donated to multiple state and federal candidates and causes -- mostly Republicans and conservative groups. In terms of state donations, the donation to Scott stands out. We found one state donation that was larger than the ones to Scott’s committee: Parker Collier gave $525,000 to the Republican Party of Florida in 2010.

In 2010, Parker and Miles Collier were ranked seventh in the country among top individuals funding outside spending groups, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Our ruling

NextGen’s ad states that "Rick Scott drank from a fountain of campaign cash from the company that profited off pollution" and received $200,000 from oil interests.

Scott’s campaign received $50,000 from four different members of the Collier family. The Collier Resources Co. leased mineral rights on its land to Hughes for drilling, so it’s fair to refer to those donations as being from "oil interests." 

However, there are two key elements of the claim that are misleading.

The ad doesn’t name the company or campaign donor, so it’s possible for viewers who are knowledgeable about the controversy to mistakenly assume that the donations were by Hughes. 

The other problematic part is that there isn’t proof that pollution occurred. The state’s preliminary tests indicated there was no contamination. Though environmentalists say additional testing is needed, we rate claims based on information available at the time.

We rate this claim Half True.

Our Sources

NextGen Climate, "Fountain" TV ad, Aug. 11, 2014

Republican Party of Florida, "Fiction" TV ad, Aug. 11, 2014

Florida Department of Environmental Protection, "Consent order with Dan A. Hughes," April 2014

Florida Department of Environmental Protection, "Letter from DEP Secretary Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. to Dan A. Hughes company and Collier Resources Co," June 18, 2014

Florida Department of Environmental Protection press release, "DEP continues holding Dan A. Hughes accountable," July 9, 2014

Florida Department of Environmental Protection, "DEP revokes Dan A. Hughes’ companies permits and files lawsuit in Collier County," July 18, 2014

Collier Resources Company, Website, Accessed Aug. 12, 2014

Florida Division of Elections, Donations by Miles, Parker, Barron and Thomas Collier to Let’s Get to Work political committee, January 2013

Center for Responsive Politics, Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups, 2010

Naples Daily News, "Estates residents alarmed by letter about possible neighborhood evacuation," April 27, 2013

News Press, "Golden Gate Estates resident objects to proposed oil wells," Accessed in Nexis, April 27, 2013

Naples Daily News, "DEP gives OK for oil drilling in Golden Gate Estates," Accessed in Nexis, Sept. 20, 2013

Naples Daily News, "Special Report: Oil drilling company has leased 115,000 acres, including land under dozens of homes," Accessed in Nexis, Oct. 27, 2013

Naples Daily News, "DEP letter to Dan Hughes co outlines outlines required steps to restore public confidence," July 3, 2014

Naples Daily News, "DEP revokes Hughes Collier-Hogan well permit," July 18, 2014

Sun-Sentinel, "Fracking-like drilling near Everglades raises alarms," May 10, 2014

Tampa Bay Times, "Permit for oil drilling near homes and panther refuge stirs uproar," Oct. 6, 2013

Tampa Bay Times, "Scott’s links to oil driller attacked," Accessed in Nexis, June 15, 2014

Tampa Bay Times, "Oil company won’t drill more wells," July 12, 2014

Miami Herald Naked Politics blog, "Charlie Crist flies to enviro press conference -- on jet of developer fined for pollution," July 25, 2014

Miami Herald Naked Politics blog, "Steyer’s NextGen climate blasts Scott in one-two ad punch over Everglades, Duke Energy," Aug. 8, 2014

NPR, "Florida County goes to court over ‘acid fracking’ near Everglades," July 2, 2014

Newsweek, "Oil prospectus seek their next big strike in South Florida’s Everglades," Feb. 27, 2014

PolitiFact Scott-O-Meter, Explore the expansion of domestic drilling in a safe environmentally-sound way, Last update Oct. 2, 2013

PolitiFact, "Rick Scott signed a law to give politicians ‘an easy way to avoid disclosing their personal finances,’ Nelson says," June 23, 2014

Interview, David Blackmon, spokesman for Dan A. Hughes company, Aug. 12, 2014

Interview, Priscylla M Oliva, Executive Assistant Barron Collier Companies, Aug. 12, 2014

Interview, Suzanne Henkels, spokeswoman for NextGen Climate, Aug. 12, 2014

Interview, Greg Blair, spokesman for Gov. Rick Scott’s campaign, Aug. 12, 2014

Interview, Tiffany Cowie, spokeswoman for Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Aug. 14, 2015

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Amy Sherman

NextGen ad says Rick Scott takes money from a company that pollutes

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up