Facts are under assault in 2020.

We can't fight back misinformation about the election and COVID-19 without you. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact

More Info

I would like to contribute

Amy Sherman
By Amy Sherman October 13, 2014

Republican Party attacks Charlie Crist for Digital Domain mess and calls it 'de facto Ponzi scheme'

Gov. Rick Scott and his opponent Charlie Crist are having a heyday accusing each other of being corrupt.

Crist and the Democrats have repeatedly attacked Scott for the $1.7 billion Medicare fraud fine against Columbia/HCA, a health care company headed by Scott before he stepped down in 1997 amid the federal investigation.

Scott and the Republicans have attacked Crist for his friendship with a past campaign donor, Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein, who went to prison for a $1.4 billion Ponzi scheme in 2011. Crist was not implicated in the Ponzi scheme.

A new TV ad by the Republican Party of Florida reminds voters about Crist’s Rothstein connection and then makes this claim:

"And now Crist is embroiled in a fraud case for steering taxpayer money to a de facto Ponzi scheme," says the narrator.

The text on the screen then states: "Florida lawsuit calls Digital Domain ‘de facto Ponzi scheme,’" citing a July 2014 article in the South Florida Business Journal.

Digital Domain is a special effects movie company that took $20 million in state money under then-Gov. Crist before it went bankrupt in 2012.

The state did file a lawsuit that called the botched deal a "de facto Ponzi scheme," but the ad omits crucial context about that lawsuit: It was filed recently by attorney William Scherer, a Scott supporter and frequent donor to GOP candidates.

Crist’s campaign lawyer, Mark Herron, sent a letter to TV stations calling the ad "false" and urging them not to air it.

We decided to fact-check Crist’s role in the Digital Domain deal and whether he was "embroiled in a fraud case for steering taxpayer money to a de facto Ponzi scheme."

Digital Domain lawsuit

Digital Domain California, created by director James Cameron, animated the scenes in Titanic and the Transformers movies. Despite its creative success, the company had debt problems. (For a thorough analysis of the Digital Domain fiasco, read this Palm Beach Post investigation.)

Digital Domain Florida was formed in 2009 with hopes that it would get money here to settle debt from its California company. But that strategy wasn’t known to state officials at the time.

After Enterprise Florida rejected a request for Digital Domain to get $20 million, the company sought another avenue. State Rep. Kevin Ambler, R-Tampa, inserted a budget amendment that included the $20 million. Crist signed off on the budget in June 2009.

But in September 2012, the Port St. Lucie company announced it was closing its Florida operations, filing for bankruptcy and laying off more than 300 employees.

The state hired Scherer to go after Digital Domain, and Scherer filed his lawsuit in the 19th Judicial Circuit in Port St. Lucie on July 22, 2014. The suit names Digital Domain executives and entities involved with the company as co-defendants, as well as Ambler, who was given a position on Digital Domain’s board in 2011 after he left the Legislature. Ambler’s son also got a job with the company.

The lawsuit doesn’t name Crist as a defendant. However, Scherer’s lawsuit repeatedly points the finger at Crist and casts him as a key politician responsible for the state’s end of the deal. In fact, the lawsuit mentions Crist by name 35 times. The lawsuit portrays Crist as being wooed by Digital Domain executives starting years before the company got the state money.

Scherer’s account of Crist starts in 2007 when an entrepreneur involved in Digital Domain, Sean Heyniger, invited Crist to a party in order to lobby Crist to give the company state money. Heyniger’s ex-wife, Kelly Heyniger, had been dating Crist at the time. The lawsuit says that Crist went to California to check out the project.

Featured Fact-check

A different picture emerges in the state inspector general’s report ordered by Scott after the company collapsed. That report says that no laws or rules were broken by state officials, though it generally raises concerns about the process for companies to get state incentive money. The report shows how several politicians and state officials -- not only Crist -- played a role in Digital Domain walking away with $20 million. It portrays Crist as making sure legislative leaders were involved by sending a letter to Senate President Jeff Atwater and House Speaker Larry Cretul asking for them to notify them of the funding before he approved it. (The report also stated that a lack of documentation and conflicting information hampered the ability of the inspector general to make a complete determination. Crist didn’t return a message by investigators.)

So Crist did play a significant role in the company getting state money -- but he wasn’t the only political player who made that happen.

The Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times wrote that the report showed that "several legislative power players said ‘Yes’ to a deal that later cost taxpayers dearly." That included Crist, Ambler, Crist’s economic development director Dale Brill and legislative power brokers, including then state Rep. David Rivera, who chaired the state’s legislative budget commission where the project was discussed before it received state money.

Crist told the Palm Beach Post in 2013 that he signed off on the $20 million grant because he thought Digital Domain represented a promising opportunity for the state.

"I was really supportive of trying to develop the film industry," Crist said.

Was it a ‘de facto Ponzi scheme’?

In the lawsuit, Scherer wrote, "Digital Domain California was a de facto Ponzi scheme. It was a serial borrower which constantly replaced old debt with new debt to keep the enterprise going."

Digital Domain now faces allegations of fraud in a civil suit, but was it a ‘de facto Ponzi scheme,’ as the ad suggests?

We interviewed Andrew Levi, a former federal prosecutor who prosecuted Ponzi schemers in South Florida and is now in private practice.

"It definitely is not a classic Ponzi scheme," Levi said. "It's more of a debt scheme."

In a classic Ponzi scheme, a business -- which may or may not include a legitimate practice -- solicits money from investors with promises of high returns. When the business can’t deliver on the returns, it seeks money from a second group of investors to pay off the first group. The scheme ultimately implodes when it can’t continue to pay off investors.

According to Scherer’s lawsuit, Digital Domain California started up Digital Domain Florida with the intention of soliciting money and covering their debt from the California company.

"It doesn’t mean that it’s not a fraud of some kind if the allegations are true, but it doesn’t fit into the common classic definition of a Ponzi scheme," Levi said. "It’s really a stretch to apply the term ‘Ponzi scheme.’ "

A campaign spokesman for Crist, Brendan Gilfillan, described Digital Domain as a "business failure, not a crime, and Rick Scott’s own administration has said Gov. Crist did nothing wrong."

Crist isn’t alone in handing out state money in exchange for jobs that failed to materialize.

A Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times investigation found that under Scott the state gave $266 million in tax breaks and other incentives in return for 45,258 new jobs, but only 5 percent of the jobs materialized.

Our ruling

The Republicans’ ad said, "Crist is embroiled in a fraud case for steering taxpayer money to a de facto Ponzi scheme," referring to Digital Domain getting $20 million in state incentives and then going belly up.

But a state report, ordered by Scott, concluded there were no violations of law or rules by Crist or any other politician. The report also showed Crist was one of many political players who helped the company get the state money.

A civil court could find that Digital Domain committed fraud. However, the company’s plan to pay off its debt in another state by getting money from Florida doesn’t meet the definition of a classic Ponzi scheme. Also, while Crist is mentioned in the court filing, he's not a defendant in the case. 

We rate this claim False.

Our Sources

Tampa Bay Times The Buzz blog, "Here’s the corruption ad this really upsets team Charlie Crist," Oct. 8, 2014

19th Judicial Circuit, State of Florida vs. Digital Domain CEO John Textor and co-defendants, July 22, 2014

Executive office of the Governor Office of the Chief Inspector General, Review of grant to Digital Domain, March 26, 2013

Federal Election Commission, Donation by John Textor to Republican Party of Florida, May 18, 2009

St. Lucie Clerk of Courts, Digital Domain case court docket, Filed July 22, 2014

South Florida Business Journal, "Florida lawsuit calls Digital Domain ‘de facto Ponzi scheme,’" July 23, 2014

Palm Beach Post, "Sly legislative move leads to quick $20 million for project in St. Lucie," Oct. 11, 2009

Palm Beach Post, "Crist briefed leaders before secret giveaways," Oct. 12, 2009

Palm Beach Post, "How public’s millions vanished," June 16, 2013

Orlando Sentinel, "Crist’s digital domain deal becomes lawsuit by Scott," July 27, 2014

Tampa Bay Times, "She’s a mom, actress and now the governor’s girlfriend," May 22, 2007

Tampa Bay Times, "Jobs in Florida: the Rick Scott record," Dec. 6, 2013

Miami Herald, "Bad economic deal could leave Florida on the hook for $20 million," Sept. 12, 2012

Miami Herald, "When state dollars don’t pay dividends," Dec. 8, 2013

Miami Herald, "State stars in incentives horror show," Jan. 20, 2013

Miami Herald, "Before troubled $20 million grant, Digital Domain had lots of help from Tallahassee," March 27, 2013

PolitiFact, "In ad to promote Rick Scott, Rothstein investor says he was ‘swindled’ by Charlie Crist," Sept. 22, 2014

PolitiFact, "Republican ad says Scott Rothstein bought Charlie Crist’s judicial appointments," Aug. 25, 2014

PolitiFact, "Crist says Scott ‘teamed up’ with Ponzi schemer Rothstein to attack him," Sept. 2, 2014

PolitiFact, "Crist says Scott pleaded the 5th 75 times ‘to avoid jail,’" Sept. 25, 2014

Interview, Andrew Levi, former federal prosecutor and now a lawyer in private practice at Lehr Levi & Mendez, P.A., Oct. 8, 2014

Interview, William Scherer, attorney who filed lawsuit for state against Digital Domain and a Gov. Rick Scott contributor, Oct. 8, 2014

Interview, Brendan Gilfillan, Charlie Crist campaign spokesman, Oct. 8, 2014

Interview, Susan Hepworth, Republican Party of Florida spokeswoman, Oct. 8, 2014

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Amy Sherman

Republican Party attacks Charlie Crist for Digital Domain mess and calls it 'de facto Ponzi scheme'

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up