Facts are under assault in 2020.
We can't fight back misinformation about the election and COVID-19 without you. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact
I would like to contribute
After another year of vacancy for the iconic downtown high-rise known as the Superman building, Providence Journal columnist Edward Fitzpatrick had a question for the owners of the building at 111 Westminster St.:
Why do they think they can’t redevelop the landmark without aid from taxpayers?
The building’s principal owner, David C. Sweetser, fielded the question with help from Bill Fischer, a Rhode Island lobbyist who serves as a spokesman for the Massachusetts-based company that Sweetser founded, High Rock Development LLC.
A major component of their answer involved a comparison of the development environment in Boston and Providence.
In his column, Fitzpatrick wrote that Sweetser, of Wellesley, Massachusetts, told him that Boston is just 60 minutes away and it’s offering subsidies to developers who can charge higher rent than developers can get in Providence while construction costs are more or less equal. As a result, Sweetser told Fitzpatrick, the Boston skyline is "completely dominated by cranes."
The statement from Sweetser, who wants tens of millions in public aid, seems to suggest that Providence would see more construction if it could provide sufficient help to offset lower rents.
We set out to break down the claim. Our first stop was subsidies. Is Boston giving them to developers? Fischer referred us to the Boston Redevelopment Authority.
The authority’s spokesman, Nicholas Martin, confirmed that yes, Boston gives subsidies, in the form of tax relief, to certain "impactful" projects.
One prominent example is the $25 million in property tax relief offered to General Electric, which is moving its headquarters to Boston from Connecticut. There are other smaller-scale examples.
However, lots of projects in Boston, including many with derricks swiping the skyline, are not getting subsidies, said Martin.
"I would not hesitate to say that the majority of construction that’s going on in the city of Boston is not subsidized," Martin said. (It should be noted that Sweetser never said that all, or most, Boston projects get subsidies.)
The disparity between rents in Providence and Boston was next on our list. Can Boston developers, the same ones getting subsidies, charge more than developers can charge in Providence?
Yes. This is well-known. Two sources that Fischer provided highlight the disparity.
Researchers at Transwestern recently calculated average rent per square foot for Boston’s "Class A" office space at $52. Transwestern is a global real estate services company that provides research on office space for Boston and New York, but not Providence.
A 2015 analysis by MG Commercial, which sells and leases commercial real estate in Rhode Island and southern Massachusetts, says Class-A office space in Providence ranges from $25 to $32 per square foot.
CBRE is another worldwide firm that provides real estate services, including market research for both Boston and Providence.
CBRE’s market outlook for 2015 showed Class-A office space in Boston ranging from $53 per square foot to almost $63 while asking rents for Class-A properties in Providence were about $31 per square foot.
Now we needed to check on construction costs. We reached out to Gilbane Building Co. an international construction company based in Providence.
At our request, the construction firm’s Rhode Island team leader, John Sinnott, analyzed construction cost data from the MS Means City Cost Index, a standard industry tool.
"While there is a slight overall difference in costs between Boston and Providence — when it comes to larger more complex projects costs are roughly the same," said Sinnott.
A rehab of the Superman building would be in the larger, more complex category.
We were finally near the end, the part about cranes "dominating the skyline."
There are so many that the Boston Business Journal has a "Crane Watch" graphic on its web site. The current graphic lists more than 85.
When he was asked why he needs public aid to do something with the Superman building, Sweetser pointed to the boom in Boston and cited a number of factors for it: Boston’s higher rents, comparable construction costs and subsidies.
As a result, the Boston skyline is "completely dominated by cranes," Sweetser said.
Because Sweetser wants subsidies and says he can’t begin work on the old Industrial National Bank Building without them, it’s hard not to focus on subsidies when thinking about the two cities, even though many projects in Boston aren’t getting them.
He could have said more simply: Boston’s skyline is filled with cranes because its economy is booming.
As a result, Boston rents, a reliable economic indicator, are appreciably higher than those in Providence. The Boston real estate market is responding to that demand with lots of new construction.
We rate his claim as True.
ProvidenceJournal.com, "Look! Up in the air! It’s another vacant year!" Jan. 3, 2016
Edward Fitzpatrick, tape of interview at Superman building, email Jan. 6, 2016
Nick Martin, spokesman for Boston Redevelopment Authority, interviews Jan. 4 and Jan. 14-15, 2016
Bill Fischer, spokesman, High Rock Development LLC, interview Jan. 11, 2016, and email, Jan. 8, Jan. 11 and Jan. 13, 2016
Transwestern.net, "Greater Boston Office Market Indicators By Market," Second quarter 2015, accessed Jan. 12, 2016
MGCommercial.com, "RI market analysis," accessed Jan. 12, 2016
BizJournals.com/Boston, Boston Business Journal, "Crane Watch: Breaking down the biggest construction projects in Greater Boston," Jan. 11, 2016, accessed Jan. 11, 2016
BostonGlobe.com, "A new age for an old town," March 1, 2015, accessed Jan. 13, 2016
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.