Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Warren Fiske
By Warren Fiske September 14, 2022

Spanberger's rejection of corporate PAC money needs a little explanation

If Your Time is short

  • Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., says she doesn't accept corporate political action committee money.
  • She does, however, accept contrubutions from leadership PACs run by politicians that raise some of their money from corporate PACs.
  • Federal Election Commission reports show that 3.4% of the of Spanberger's campaign receipts for this fall's election come from leadership PACs. 

When corporations offer campaign contributions, Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., says  she turns away.

"I don’t accept a dime of corporate money," she tweeted Sept. 2.

Spanberger, who is seeking a third term in Congress this fall, is running against Republican Yesli Vega, a Prince William County supervisor. They’re competing in the newly redrawn 7th Congressional District that has 72% of its population in Prince William, Stafford and Spotsylvania counties.

Since her first campaign in 2018, Spanberger has pledged to reject corporate money, and Republicans have accused her of accepting backdoor contributions from big businesses. 

According to her latest filings with the Federal Election Commission, Spanberger raised $5.6 million in contributions from Jan. 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. None of that money came directly from corporations.

But here’s an asterisk: Although Spanberger refuses direct donations from corporate PACs, she accepts contributions from other PACs that contain corporate-directed money.

Spanberger has accepted money from both leadership PACs, which are set up by most members of Congress to help candidates from their party, and ideological PACs, which focus on special causes, such as regulation, defense or health care. Some of the political action committees that have donated to Spanberger receive money from corporate PACs.

One example: Spanberger has received a maximum of $10,000 from the Forward Together PAC, associated with Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. Forward Together has accepted contributions from a list of corporate PACs, including Amazon, Microsoft Corp., Pfizer, Lockheed Martin Corp., General Motors Co. and Dominion Energy. We counted 57 leadership PACs that contributed to Spanberger’s campaign between the start of 2021 and June 30, 2022. Forty-eight of the PACs accepted corporate-tied donations.

We don’t know the exact amount of corporate money that has seeped into Spanberger’s campaign coffer through leadership PACs, but it’s relatively small. 

Spanberger collected $187,500 in leadership PAC donations from the start of 2021 through June 30, 2022, which was 3.4% of all the money she raised. And much of the money raised by the leadership PACs did not come from corporate sources. 

Perspective

Sixty-one members of Congress — including one Republican, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida — have current promises not to accept corporate money, according to End Citizens United, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit seeking to tighten campaign finance laws. Spanberger is the only Virginia congress member to make the pledge. Campaign finance advocates told us they’re unaware of any incumbent who is declining both corporate and leadership PAC money.

End Citizens United endorsed Spanberger because of her no-corporate-money pledge and her support of campaign finance reforms. A spokesperson for the organization said her acceptance of leadership PAC money is unimportant.

"She has absolutely kept her pledge not to take corporate PAC money," said Adam Bozzi, the group’s vice president for communications.

End Citizens United has given Spanberger an A+ rating. "There’s dark money and corporate money all through politics," Bozzi said. "Abigail Spanberger is actually one of the people who’s fighting it."

Spanberger campaign manager Sam Signori said, "Rep. Spanberger does not accept corporate PAC money, period. We welcome you to review our FEC filings to confirm that Rep. Spanberger does not accept corporate PAC contributions."

Sarah Bryner, research director for the Center for Responsive Politics, told PolitiFact in 2020 that it’s all but impossible for candidates to fully wall out corporate money. "If you need money to run a political campaign, unless you’re independently wealthy, you’re getting money from people," she said. "And most people work for corporations."

The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit organization, tracks money in American politics through its website OpenSecrets.org.

Our ruling 

Spanberger said, "I don’t accept a dime of corporate money."

She’s raised $5.5 million for this fall’s campaign — none directly from corporate political action committees. A 3.4% portion of that money is from leadership PACs that do accept money from corporate PACs among other sources. In other words, Spanberger receives a small amount of corporate PAC money indirectly.

Realizing that it may be impossible to block all traces of corporate money from a successful congressional campaign, we rate Spanberger’s statement Mostly True.

 

Our Sources

Abigail Spanberger, tweet, Sept. 2, 2022

PolitiFact Virginia, "Spanberger's no-corporate-PAC pledge needs a 2.6% elaboration," Aug. 19, 2020

Federal Election Commission, Spanberger campaign finance filings, Jan. 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

FEC, Forward Together PAC filings, Jan. 1, 2020 - June 30, 2022

Open Secrets, leadership PAC contributions, Jan. 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

End Citizens United, Spanburger’s report card, accessed Sept. 9, 2022

Interview with Adam Bozzi, vice president for communications, End Citizens United, Sept. 12, 2022

Vpap.org, Virginia 7th Congressional District, accessd Sept. 12, 2022

Email from Justin Chermol, press secretary for Spanberger’s campaign, Sept. 12, 2022

Statement from Sam Signori, Spaberger’s campaign manager, Sept. 12, 2022

 

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Warren Fiske

Spanberger's rejection of corporate PAC money needs a little explanation

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up