The article:

The toll attributable to IEDs in Afghanistan

By Martha M. Hamilton, Louis Jacobson
Published on Tuesday, August 30th, 2011 at 4:01 p.m.

On a recent trip to Pakistan, Sen. Bob Casey, talked to that nation's leadership about what they could do to help reduce the carnage caused by improvised explosive devices, or IEDs.

IEDs are a favorite weapon on insurgent fighters since they can be constructed from such easily available items as cell phones, batteries and radios and triggered either remotely or by passing vehicles. Casey talked to the Pakistani leadership about the need to reduce the flow of the explosive ammonium nitrate to neighboring Afghanistan to prevent deaths of American fighters and their allies.

In Pakistan, during a conference call with journalists, Casey reflected on service members from Pennsylvania who had been killed in Afghanistan, saying that "it is very, very rare that someone who is killed in action is not killed by an IED."

Casey was right that IEDs are a major killer in the war in Afghanistan, but he went too far when he said that other causes of deaths in hostile action are "very, very rare," so we rated his statement Mostly False.

About this article:


See Truth-O-Meter item

Researchers: Louis Jacobson

How to contact us:

We want to hear your suggestions and comments.

For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.

For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.

Browse The Truth-O-MeterTM: