The article:

How 'transparent' is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court?

By Louis Jacobson
Published on Monday, June 24th, 2013 at 9:36 a.m.

President Barack Obama has taken a lot of criticism from both friend and foe in the wake of recent disclosures about how the U.S. government monitors telephone and Internet traffic. He defended himself recently in an interview with Charlie Rose on June 17, 2013, making several claims in defense of government surveillance.

Rose asked him about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a special court that hears government requests for warrants related to national security investigations, asking "Should this be transparent in some way?"

"It is transparent, that’s why we set up the FISA court," Obama said.

But is it transparent? We delved into the details of the FISA court and found some good reasons for secrecy. We didn't find transparency. We rated Obama's statement Pants on Fire. Read our complete report.

It's Obama eighth Pants on Fire out of 479 statements we've rated since 2007. We've rated more statements on the Truth-O-Meter from Obama than any other person in American politics.

About this article:


See fact-check for complete sources.

Researchers: Louis Jacobson

Names in this article: Barack Obama

How to contact us:

We want to hear your suggestions and comments.

For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.

For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.

Browse The Truth-O-MeterTM: