Oppose extending "Miranda Rights" to foreign terrorists
Will "oppose all efforts to force our military, intelligence and law enforcement personnel operating overseas to extend 'Miranda Rights' to foreign terrorists."
House stalled Miranda rights via defense bill
Updated: Thursday, November 1st, 2012 | By Molly Moorhead
As terrorism suspects are apprehended around the world, a debate is swirling in the U.S. over how those suspects should be tried for crimes. House Republicans want the military to handle these cases, not the American criminal justice system.
That"s where Miranda rights come in. Those are the rights afforded defendants in the U.S. -- to remain silent, to speak to a lawyer, etc. Many Republicans argue that non-Americans should not be afforded those rights and tried in U.S. courts. That"s at odds with the White House, which has favored traditional prosecutions in the court system.
The case of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, known as the Christmas Day bomber (also the underwear bomber), highlights the conflict. After Abdulmutallab tried to blow up a plane with a bomb in his underwear in December 2009, the plane landed in Detroit, he confessed extensively for about an hour and then went into surgery.
After he emerged from surgery, the New York Times reported, he stopped talking, so officials decided to read him his Miranda rights. Abdulmutallab refused to cooperate for several weeks, "which some critics asserted was because of the warning,” the Times said.
Attorney General Eric Holder later issued a memo to law enforcement agents encouraging them to use a "national security safety exception” for asking questions of terrorism suspects about any immediate threats to public safety before informing them of their Miranda rights. The judge in Abdulmutallab"s case accepted that position and refused to suppress statements he made in the first hour after his arrest. President Barack Obama"s counterterrorism adviser John O. Brennan told the Times the ruling "clearly validated the national security exception.”
Nevertheless, the debate surges on. In March 2011, Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, filed the Ensuring the Collection of Critical Intelligence Act of 2011, which required the Justice Department to consult with the director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense before giving terrorists Miranda rights. The bill says the Justice Department must consult with the director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense before mirandizing or charging a foreign terrorist as a criminal.
That bill never advanced out of a House subcommittee. But Smith"s office pointed us to nearly identical language in the Fiscal Year 2012 defense authorization bill, which did pass. It says, in part, that before seeking an indictment or otherwise charging an individual in a federal court, the Attorney General shall consult with the director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense about "whether the more appropriate forum for prosecution would be a federal court or a military commission; and whether the individual should be held in civilian custody or military custody pending prosecution.”
There"s no specific discussion of Miranda rights, so we checked with Scott Roehm, counsel for the Constitution Project, a bipartisan civil liberties group.
Roehm told us that while the bill doesn"t explicitly deal with Miranda rights, "it does make prosecution in civilian federal court of certain terrorism suspects more difficult.”
The bill, he said, politicizes the decision-making process about where suspects will be tried -- criminal courts or military commissions.
"That"s relevant because the set of terrorism suspects least likely to be Mirandized are those captured and held outside the U.S. by the military, so to the extent that the impact of (the bill"s language) is to discourage moving any such suspects into civilian custody for prosecution in federal court (as opposed to, say, indefinite detention or military commission trial at Guantanamo) it does make it far less likely that those suspects would be Mirandized,” Roehm said.
It"s not clear if the same language will be renewed in the 2013 defense authorization bill, which has yet to be passed. But in 2012 at least, Republicans made it less likely that foreign terror suspects would be read Miranda rights. We rate this a Promise Kept.
Email interview with Charlotte Sellmyer, spokeswoman for Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, Sept. 20, 2012
New York Times, "Developments Rekindle Debate Over Best Approach for Terrorism Suspects,” Oct. 13, 2011
THOMAS, Ensuring the Collection of Critical Intelligence Act of 2011, March 17, 2011
THOMAS, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, April 14, 2012
Email interview with Scott Roehm, counsel for the Constitution Project, Sept. 24, 2012
We want to hear your suggestions and comments.
For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.
Keep up to date with Politifact:
- Sign up for our e-mail (about once a week)
- Put a free PolitiFact widget on your blog or Web page
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Truth-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on GOP Pledge-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Obameter items
- Advertise on PolitiFact
- Shop the PolitiFact store for T-shirts, hats and other PolitiFact swag