Equip troops to respond to new tactics
"Fully Equip Our Troops for the Missions They Face: We must listen to our ground commanders when they tell us what kinds of technology and skills they need to fight most effectively. We cannot repeat the failure to swiftly deploy up-armored vehicles in response to insurgent tactics. We must prioritize getting vitally needed equipment to our Soldiers and Marines before lives are lost."
Pentagon streamlines response to troops’ equipment needs
Updated: Monday, January 21st, 2013 | By Becky Bowers
Barack Obama made the war in Iraq a centerpiece of his 2008 campaign, promising to end the war— and to better equip troops.
The Bush administration had faced years of criticism for failing to quickly respond to insurgent roadside bombs with armored vehicles that would protect soldiers and Marines.
Priorities must change, Obama said.
The United States must "fully equip our troops for the missions they face,” his campaign literature promised. "We must listen to our ground commanders when they tell us what kinds of technology and skills they need to fight most effectively. We cannot repeat the failure to swiftly deploy up-armored vehicles in response to insurgent tactics. We must prioritize getting vitally needed equipment to our Soldiers and Marines before lives are lost."
He got a head start keeping that promise. Obama benefits from a yearslong effort begun under Bush, plus the winding down of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Priorities had already begun to change — in 2004. Iraq-bound troops had confronted Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in what the New York Times called an "extraordinary exchange.” A member of the Tennessee National Guard told him soldiers had to dig through Kuwaiti landfills to find scraps to armor their trucks. "Why don't we have those resources readily available to us?" he asked, to cheers from troops.
Military scholars Christopher Lamb and Matthew Schmidt documented what happened next: an "uproar” that "put President George W. Bush on the defensive,” and inspired a new focus on rushing up-armored vehicles and add-on armor kits to the front.
It also triggered a series of changes in how the Pentagon handles urgent requests from the field — to better, as Obama put it, "listen to our ground commanders.”
In 2005, the Pentagon launched a "joint rapid acquisition cell,” to respond to urgent needs requests. It created a task force to focus on roadside bomb deaths, the Joint IED Defeat Organization. Robert Gates, who took over the Defense Department at the end of 2006, added a task force to focus on equipment for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
Still, public attention exposed continued challenges. The Washington Post reported in 2007 that thousands of Army humvees still lacked armor upgrades, while roadside explosives inflicted 7 in 10 American casualties.
Meanwhile, mine resistant ambush protected vehicles, known as MRAPs, which would better protect troops, didn't get deployed "en masse” to Iraq for nearly five years into the conflict, according to a paper by Lamb and Schmidt.
Still, there was more left to do when Obama took office in January 2009. He kept on Gates as defense secretary, who continued to push for a speedier Pentagon response to insurgent tactics.
"We must not be so preoccupied with preparing for future conventional and strategic conflicts that we neglect to provide, both short and long term, all the capabilities necessary to fight and win conflicts such as those we face today,” Gates wrote in January 2009.
Congress had pumped tens of billions of dollars into rapid-reaction programs, but its investigative arm found in April 2010 that the Defense Department still failed to be fully "responsive” to warfighters. The Pentagon's efforts were fragmented, guidance was outdated, and new equipment still faced significant delays. In March 2011, the Government Accountability Office published a followup review, finding that the department still didn't have a comprehensive policy.
In June 2011, Gates consolidated the Pentagon's urgent needs response, creating the warfighter Senior Integration Group.
By then, of course, the war in Iraq was winding down. Fighters in Afghanistan faced not an equipment problem so much as a trust problem, with insurgents infiltrating friendly forces to murder troops, said Schmidt, the military scholar, who now teaches at the U.S. Army's School of Advanced Military Studies.
"It's not an equipment problem anymore,” he said.
The latest report from GAO shows breakthrough progress.
In April 2012, it reported that a sampling of Pentagon projects from April 2008 to December 2010 mostly made it into action within two years. Meanwhile, earlier stages of projects got shorter and shorter between 2008 and 2010 "suggesting overall improvements.”
While the rapid acquisition process has improved, experts say it's impossible to say by how much until it's again tested by the full weight of war. But military leaders achieved greater responsiveness under Obama, experts told us.
"I think the answer is a resounding yes, that they listened to ground commanders and gave them what they asked for in terms of equipment,” Schmidt said. "I think there's no question that they were responding to equipment requests."
He said that attention from the press and Congress allowed Gates to pressure the bureaucracy to "move forward.”
David Berteau, who analyzes defense contracting for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says anecdotes support the idea the Pentagon under Obama is more focused on meeting urgent needs.
"I think the effort, and from all indications, the results, indicate he has kept this promise,” Berteau said.
Phillip Lohaus, a research fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, argues Obama's budget priorities mean it may not stay that way.
"By insisting on defense cuts and by drawing down our presence in Afghanistan ahead of the previously-announced deadline, Obama is reducing the amount of the missions that the military faces, and thus might get away with ‘fully equipping them" simply by reducing the frequency and scope of their missions,” he said. "... But there is no indication that the policies he is now pursuing will leave our soldiers ‘well equipped' when next they face a conflict.”
We'll watch for backpedaling of the Pentagon's progress on its rapid acquisition process. But an effort that started before Obama's election and continued on his watch has improved the Pentagon's response to troops' urgent equipment needs. For a variety of reasons, troops in Afghanistan have not faced the same shortages that became a public rallying cry in Iraq. We rate this Promise Kept.
Editor's note: The headline on this promise was changed from "Fully and properly equip troops" to "Equip troops to respond to new tactics" to more accurately reflect the promise.
Interview with David Berteau, director, International Security Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Jan. 17, 2013
Interview with Matthew Schmidt, assistant professor, U.S. Army's School of Advanced Military Studies, Jan. 17, 2013
Interview with Russell Rumbaugh, director of budgeting for foreign affairs and defense, Stimson Center, Jan. 14, 2013
Email interview with Phillip Lohaus, research fellow, Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies, American Enterprise Institute, Jan. 17, 2013
Email interview with Jacob Stokes, research associate, Center for a New American Security, Jan. 15, 2013
Email interview with John Pike, director, GlobalSecurity.org, Jan. 14, 2013
Interview with Laura Peterson, senior policy analyst, Taxpayers for Common Sense, Jan. 11, 2013
PBS Newshour, "Troops Question Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about Armor," Dec. 9, 2004
New York Times, "Safer Vehicles for Soldiers: A Tale of Delays and Glitches," June 26, 2005
CNN.com, "Report: Marines slow to get protective vehicles into Iraq," Dec. 9, 2008
National Defense University's Joint Force Quarterly, "MRAPs, Irregular Warfare, and Pentagon Reform," October 2009, along with longer paper of same title published by National Defense University Press, June 6, 2009
National Defense University's Joint Force Quarterly, Robert M. Gates, "The National Defense Strategy: Striking the Right Balance,” January 2009
New York Times, "Iraq-Bound Troops Confront Rumsfeld Over Lack of Armor," Dec. 8, 2004
Washington Post, "Thousands of Army Humvees Lack Armor Upgrade," Feb. 12, 2007
Defense Department, "Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense,” January 2012
Defense Department, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report," February 2010
Government Accountability Office, "URGENT WARFIGHTER NEEDS: Opportunities Exist to Expedite Development and Fielding of Joint Capabilities," April 24, 2012
Government Accountability Office, "Warfighter Support: DOD"s Urgent Needs Processes Need a More Comprehensive Approach and Evaluation for Potential Consolidation," March 1, 2011
Government Accountability Office, "Improvements to DOD's Urgent Needs Processes Would Enhance Oversight and Expedite Efforts to Meet Critical Warfighter Needs," April 30, 2010
Library of Congress, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013,” accessed Jan. 18, 2013
Library of Congress, "Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011,” accessed Jan. 19. 2013
Defense Department, "Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request," February 2012
Defense Department, "Rapid Acquisition Policy and Application," June 7, 2012
Defense News, "DoD Asking Congress For Urgent-Needs Account," April 13, 2011
Signal magazine, "Urgent Warfighter Needs Trigger Rapid Response," February 2012
Increased spending for military hardware
Updated: Monday, January 11th, 2010 | By Alex Holt
During the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama promised to "listen to our ground commanders when they tell us what kinds of technology and skills they need to fight most effectively," and to "prioritize getting vitally needed equipment to our soldiers and Marines before lives are lost."
In the 2010 Defense spending bill, Congress actually appropriated more money than requested by the Obama administration for "equipment and force structure." This is significant considering the president's budget already had large requests for force protection.
Congress approved $6.3 billion for Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected vehicles, over $800 million more than requested by the Obama administration. The heavily armored MRAPs have proven to be extremely effective against improvised explosive devices and have helped significantly decrease the number of fatalities in Iraq due to IEDs.
Obama also promised to listen to commanders on the ground about the kinds of technology they need. Overwhelmingly, commanders have asked for unmanned aerial vehicles, and Congress set aside over a billion dollars to procure new UAVs, including 24 new MQ-9 Reapers.
Although the president and Congress have spent a lot of money increasing force protection, this remains an ongoing issue. We're going to continue to monitor President Obama's actions. But for now, we're rating this In the Works.
Obama campaign, "A 21st Century Military for America," accessed Jan. 11, 2010
Committee on Appropriations, "FY2010 Defense Appropriations" Dec 15, 2009
USA Today, "Roadside Bombs Decline in Iraq" by Tom Vanden Brook, Jun 22, 2008
We want to hear your suggestions and comments.
For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.
Keep up to date with Politifact:
- Sign up for our e-mail (about once a week)
- Put a free PolitiFact widget on your blog or Web page
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Truth-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on GOP Pledge-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Obameter items
- Advertise on PolitiFact
- Shop the PolitiFact store for T-shirts, hats and other PolitiFact swag