Increase participation in cancer-related clinical trials
"Will seek to increase participation in clinical trials to 10 percent of adult cancer patients by requiring coverage of patient clinical trial costs in the new public and private plans offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange, increasing NCI reimbursement for patient participation in clinical research and requesting the NCI Director to identify regulatory barriers that prevent the timely implementation and completion of successful clinical trials."
Provision on clinical trials is in health care law
Updated: Friday, January 11th, 2013 | By Louis Jacobson
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to boost patients' access to clinical trials for new drugs.
Clinical trials are studies in which patients are assigned to receive one or more interventions, such as a drug or other therapy, or no intervention at all, so that researchers can evaluate whether the drug or therapy is safe and effective.
The key part of the promise is Obama's pledge to require "coverage of patient clinical trial costs in the new public and private plans offered through the National Health Insurance Exchange.”
This part of the promise was largely kept -- although it merits an asterisk.
The big health care law Obama signed -- the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act -- says that insurers "may not deny” individuals' participation in clinical trials and may not limit or impose additional conditions on the coverage of "routine patient costs” stemming from the trial. This is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2014. (Additional details are available here and here.)
Getting the clinical trials provision into the law was something "patient advocates fought long and hard for, so we considered it a victory,” said Shelley Fuld Nasso, a health policy consultant for the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.
Still, Nasso acknowledges that the battle is not entirely over. On Dec. 26, 2012, her group submitted comments to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius urging the department to make sure the clinical trials provision is specifically included when it crafts more detailed guidelines for implementing the health care law.
Nasso describes the group"s comments to Sebelius as "due diligence to ensure that the provision is implemented as stated in the law,” adding that "we believe it will be.”
Sara Rosenbaum, the chair of the Department of Health Policy at George Washington University, said the group's decision to keep the pressure on is probably a wise one. "The law is relatively specific in certain respects, such as the definition of what is an approved clinical trial, but unclear in other ways, most specifically the relationship of the clinical trial standard and the” subsequent HHS standard, known as "essential health benefits.”
Meanwhile, the Obama administration has made progress on the other parts of the promise -- to identify regulatory barriers and to increase National Cancer Institute reimbursement for patients taking part in clinical research.
In 2009, the National Cancer Institute asked the Institute of Medicine, an independent scientific body, to review the cancer institute"s clinical trial program. The Institute of Medicine produced a report on April 15, 2010, that found problems with inefficiencies and underfunding.
Partly to address these concerns, the Board of Scientific Advisors of the National Cancer Institute in 2011 approved a proposal to fund the Integrated NCI Clinical Trials Network, which, among other things, increases reimbursement for enrolling patients in trials by $2,000 for high-performing centers. On July 23, 2012, HHS posted an offering of funds in which the National Clinical Trials Network will commit about $90 million over five years.
Finally, the Food and Drug Administration has issued a draft guidance that outlines strategies for completing trials for rare cancers and other rare diseases, a document that "demonstrates the willingness of FDA to clearly articulate standards for clinical trials," Nasso said.
In all, the administration has made significant progress on each of the elements of this promise. There is some concern about whether the final regulations will stick to what the health care law promised, but if they do not, we will take another look at this promise. For now, we rate it a Promise Kept.
Textof the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, comments to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Dec. 26, 2012
Institute of Medicine, "A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program," April 15, 2010
Department of Health and Human Services, funding opportunity announcement, July 23, 2012
NCI Cancer Bulletin, "Cancer Clinical Trials System Restructuring Moves Forward," December 13, 2011
Food and Drug Administration, "Guidance for Industry: Enrichment Strategies for Clinical Trials to Support Approval of Human Drugs and Biological Products," accessed Jan. 11, 2013
Aetna, "Questions and Answers About Health Reform,” July 2010
Association of Community Cancer Centers, "Coverage for Individuals Participating in Approved Clinical Trials under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010," accessed Jan. 11, 2013
Email interview with Shelley Fuld Nasso, health policy consultant for the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Jan. 11, 2013
Email interview with Sara Rosenbaum, chair of the Department of Health Policy at George Washington University, Jan. 10, 2013
First step is creating the exchanges
Updated: Monday, December 14th, 2009 | By Angie Drobnic Holan
President Barack Obama promised to increase participation in cancer-related clinical trials by requiring that patient costs be covered. The first step toward doing that is creating health insurance exchanges.
These exchanges would provide a virtual marketplace for health insurance for those who do not already have coverage through their employer or through a government program such as Medicare or Medicaid. Regulations for plans on the exchanges would eventually also apply to employer-provided plans.
The health reform bills pending in Congress create the exchanges and give appointed officials broad powers to define what insurers will have to cover. The bills do not particularly mention cancer-related clinical trials, but the officials could require it as part of covered hospitalization services.
We have to wait until the exchanges are up and running before we can tell if this promise is being fulfilled. At that point, there would still be significant action needed before the promise could be fulfilled. But the legislation creating the exchanges is just enough for us to move this promise to In the Works.
U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee,
HR 3962 - the Affordable Health Care For America Act
U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, HR 3962 - Section by Section
Kaiser Family Foundation, Analysis of Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) , accessed Nov. 4, 2009
We want to hear your suggestions and comments.
For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.
Keep up to date with Politifact:
- Sign up for our e-mail (about once a week)
- Put a free PolitiFact widget on your blog or Web page
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Truth-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on GOP Pledge-O-Meter items
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds on Obameter items
- Advertise on PolitiFact
- Shop the PolitiFact store for T-shirts, hats and other PolitiFact swag