The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Thompson

Every time the price of gasoline rises 1 cent, "it's a billion dollars out of our economy that goes to Saudi Arabia."

Tommy Thompson on Friday, March 23rd, 2012 in a campaign speech

Wisconsin GOP Senate candidate Tommy Thompson says every penny increase at the pump sends $1 billion from U.S. to Saudi Arabia

In a March 23, 2012 campaign speech, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Tommy Thompson made a billion-dollar claim about a 1-cent increase in the price of gasoline.

Addressing the La Crosse County Republican Party in western Wisconsin, the former Wisconsin governor called for the United States to become "energy independent," then said:  

"Every time, ladies and gentlemen, a penny goes up on that gasoline cost -- and how do you like those $4.25 a gallon? -- every time a penny goes up, it's a billion dollars out of our economy that goes to Saudi Arabia."

That’s real money.

Does cash really flow out of the country at that rate -- to a single oil-producing country -- from folks filling their gas tanks?

When we asked the Thompson campaign for evidence, consultant Darrin Schmitz made two points in an email:

1. Thompson meant to say Middle East when he referred to Saudi Arabia.

So, right off the bat, Thompson’s claim appears to be wrong.

2. A 50-cent increase in the price of gas costs U.S. consumers nearly $60 billion per year, according to a March 2012 article in The Atlantic magazine.  

The Atlantic article did say a 1-cent gas price increase would cost U.S. consumers $1.2 billion per year, which puts something of a time frame on Thompson’s statement. But that’s a different measure than $1 billion going from the U.S. economy to Saudi Arabia (or the Middle East, for that matter).

We contacted four experts, each of whom used essentially the same math to evaluate Thompson’s Saudi Arabia claim. They agreed that a 1-cent increase in the price of a gallon of gas indicates that the price of a barrel of crude oil had risen 42 cents.

Jay Hakes is the former director of the U.S. Energy Information Administration under President Bill Clinton and author of A Declaration of Energy Independence. He  said that on average, the U.S. imported 1,195,000 barrels of Saudi petroleum per day in 2011, according to the Energy Information Administration.

If each barrel cost 42 cents more, the U.S. would pay Saudi Arabia $501,900 more per day -- or slightly more than $183 million per year.

That means it would take nearly 5 1/2 years for the U.S. to spend $1 billion more on Saudi oil.

John Kingston is global director of news for the energy publication Platts. He multiplied 42 cents by a slightly different number -- 1,422,000 -- the net number of barrels per day imported from Saudi Arabia in January 2012, which is the most recent figure available.

That comes to an additional cost of $597,240 per day, or nearly $218 million per year. So it would take 4-1/2 years to reach $1 billion.

Jim Williams is an energy economist and owner of WTRG Economics in Arkansas. He took the same approach Kingston did.

Charles Ebinger is director of the energy security initiative at the Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C. think tank. He said that for years, many people have claimed that a 1-cent increase in the gasoline tax would cost motorists $1 billion a year. He said that is roughly accurate, depending on how much gas motorists consume in a given year.

Thompson didn’t mention a gas tax increase in his statement, but let’s take a look.
Ebinger said that if a 1-cent increase in the cost of gas costs motorists $1 billion over one year, about $130 million of that money would go to Saudi Arabia, since about 13 percent of crude oil imports come from that country.

At that rate, it would take nearly eight years for Saudi Arabia to collect an additional $1 billion from the United States.

In any case, although Thompson singled it out, Saudi Arabia isn’t the largest provider of crude to the United States.

The latest figures show that in January 2012, net oil imports from Canada were 2.66 million barrels per day, nearly double the 1.42 million barrels from Saudi Arabia, which ranked second. For all of 2011, Canada ranked first, Mexico second and Saudi Arabia third in the number of barrels imported per day.

And the balance of U.S. imports and exports is improving.

In 2011, U.S. exports of gasoline, diesel and other fuels exceeded imports for the first time since 1949, according to a claim rated True by PolitiFact New Jersey. The biggest contributing factor, however, was the increase in foreign purchases of distillate fuel, which includes diesel fuel and heating oil.

Our rating

Thompson said that every time the price of gasoline increases by 1 cent, "it's a billion out of our economy that goes to Saudi Arabia." His campaign said Thompson meant to say Middle East and cited a statistic that covers a one-year period.

Four experts said it would take roughly four to eight years for a 1-cent increase in gas prices to result in an increase of $1 billion in what the U.S. spends to import Saudi oil.

(Incidentally, we asked Williams, one of the experts, about the Middle East. He said it would take 3-1/2 years for $1 billion to flow from the U.S. to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar and United Arab Emirates as a result of a penny increase in gas. So, even if Thompson had said Middle East instead of Saudi Arabia, his statement would be inaccurate.)

We rate Thompson’s claim False.

(You can comment on this item on the Journal Sentinel's web site)

Editor's note: On April 20, 2012 we revised this item to note that if the price of a barrel of oil rose by 42 cents, the U.S. would pay Saudi Arabia $501,900 more per day -- or slightly more than $183 million per year. The original wording, which said the U.S. would pay $501,900 more per barrel per day, was incorrect.

Advertisement
About this statement:

Published: Thursday, April 19th, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

Subjects: Corrections and Updates, Economy, Energy, Iraq

Sources:

YouTube.com, Tommy Thompson speech (at 11:30), March 23, 2012

Interview and email interview, Tommy Thompson campaign spokesman Vartan Djihanian, April 17, 2012

Interview and email interview, former U.S. Energy Information Administration administrator Jay Hakes, April 13 and 15, 2012

Interview and email interview, Platts global director of news John Kingston, April 16 and 17, 2012

Interview, Brookings Institution energy security initiative director Charles Ebinger, April 16, 2012

Interview, energy economist and WTRG Economics owner James L. Williams,
April 17 and 18, 2012

U.S. Energy Information Administration, "Petroleum trade: Imports from OPEC countries," March 2012

U.S. Energy Information Administration, "Total crude oil and products net imports by country," April 2, 2012

PolitiFact New Jersey, "Robert Menendez claims U.S. fuel exports surpassed imports in 2011 for the first time since 1949," April 11, 2012

Christian Science Monitor, "Top 15 sources of U.S. crude oil imports," April 12, 2012

The Atlantic, "The $110 effect: What higher gas prices could really do to the economy," March 13, 2012

Written by: Tom Kertscher
Researched by: Tom Kertscher
Edited by: Greg Borowski

How to contact us:

We want to hear your suggestions and comments. Email the Wisconsin Truth-O-Meter with feedback and with claims you'd like to see checked. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.

Browse The Wisconsin Truth-O-Meter:
Subscribe:

Keep up to date with Politifact Wisconsin: