Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
The Republican Party of Virginia was ready to roll when Democrat Timothy M. Kaine recently announced he will run for the U.S. Senate next year.
The GOP posted on its website a list of unflattering numerical milestones from Kaine’s term as governor from 2006 to 2010.
One item particularly grabbed our attention.
Under the subhead "7 days," the GOP wrote that’s "How long it took Tim Kaine to break his campaign promise not to raise taxes."
Kaine indeed asked for a tax increase on his seventh day in office. On Jan. 20, 2006, he proposed a $1 billion-a-year transportation package that called for higher levies on vehicle sales and insurance as well as increased traffic fines and registration fees.
Whether he broke a campaign promise is more complicated. Kaine held a murky position on taxes during the campaign.
So how do the Republicans justify their claim that Kaine promised not to raise taxes?
Garren Shipley, the communications director for the state GOP, pointed us to a gubernatorial debate on Oct. 9, 2005. Jerry Kilgore, the Republican nominee, charged that Kaine had a history of supporting tax increases that guaranteed he would try to raise levies as governor. Kilgore portrayed himself as a tax cutter.
"There you go again, Jerry, just making stuff up," Kaine retorted.
Shipley said Kaine’s response "very strongly" implies he would not propose tax hikes.
Perhaps. But a review of the debate transcript shows Kaine could have been responding to a variety of charges and claims Kilgore made in a minute-long barrage. In any event, Kaine’s reply hardly constitutes a no-tax vow.
Shipley offers a second argument that is more complex. Kaine repeatedly promised he would not seek a tax hike for transportation unless he could guarantee the revenues would be sequestered and never used for any purpose other than improving roads, rail and public transportation.
Shipley says Kaine broke his campaign vow by introducing the transportation plan without the guarantee.
Kaine did promise not to seek a tax increase for transportation unless the money was "locked up." He objected to a legislative practice of siphoning money from state transportation fund during lean times to help pay for schools, prisons and health care. The practice led to the 2002 defeat of local referendums that would have raised taxes for roads in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Polls showed many voters in those regions did not trust state politicians to keep their promise that the revenues would never stray from transportation.
Kaine solidified his position in a July 16, 2005, gubernatorial debate while answering a tax question posed by Bob Holsworth, a political scientist.
"I have pledged, Bob, as you said, that I will not support any increase in transportation taxes or revenues so long as the Transportation Trust Fund is unlocked," Kaine said. "I don’t think I can look voters in the face and ask them for more money for transportation if there is a hole in the bucket and money is going to drain out."
Kaine at first advocated that road money be locked through passage of a state constitutional amendment shielding transportation money from raids. But enacting a constitutional amendment is a three-year process. Business leaders in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads weren’t willing to wait that long to ease traffic congestion.
So Kaine, in August 2005, altered his position to open the possibility of raising taxes during his first year in office. While still endorsing a constitutional amendment, he gave himself wiggle room by saying he was also open to locking the transportation money through other means. Kaine was short on details.
Days after his inauguration, Kaine offered specifics in his State of the Commonwealth address. He said that in lieu of a constitutional fix, he would amend any new transportation tax or revenue laws to ensure they would expire if the money was shifted to other programs. He also promised to veto any budget that diverted transportation money.
Kaine’s protections would not have made the funds tamper-proof, however. The General Assembly was empowered to override any amendments or vetoes Kaine might use to safeguard the money. And future governors would not be bound by any commitments Kaine made to shield funds.
When he unveiled his transportation plan on Jan. 20, the GOP criticized Kaine for breaching his campaign pledge not to raise taxes for transportation without a lock. The Richmond Times-Dispatch noted, however, in its following-day story, that Kaine as a candidate "refused to rule out new road taxes."
Kaine’s bill died in the Republican-led House of Delegates, which has been and remains opposed to raising taxes. The 2005 House also killed 10 bills that would have placed before voters a constitutional amendment to put a lock on transportation money.
The Republican Party of Virginia says that within a week of becoming governor in 2006, Kaine broke a promise not to raise taxes. Kaine indeed proposed a $1 billion transportation tax increase on his seventh day in office.
There’s no evidence Kaine made a no-tax pledge during the 2005 campaign. To the contrary, Kaine set conditions under which he would seek a tax hike for transportation. Kaine did, however, leave himself open for criticism by compromising those conditions once he got into office.
We rate the GOP claim Barely True.
Editor's note: This statement was rated Barely True when it was published. On July 27, 2011, we changed the name for the rating to Mostly False.
Republican Party of Virginia website,accessed on April 18, 2011.
Interviews with Garren Shipley, press secretary, Republican Party of Virginia, April 18, 2011.
C-SPAN videoof the University of Virginia’s Oct. 9, 2005 gubernatorial debate between Tim Kaine and Jerry Kilgore. (Exhange on taxes is just over 23 minutes into the debate.)
Transcript of July 16, 2005 Virginia Bar Association 2005 gubernatorial debate.
PolitiFact Virginia, "George Allen says Tim Kaine proposed $6 billion in tax increase while governor," April 16, 2011.
Richmond Times-Dispatch, "Kaine Pushes his plan on transportation funds - he wants to ensure money will be used properly, says Potts blocked progress," August 16, 2005.
Richmond Times-Dispatch, "Under two plans to improve the state’s roads, you could pay: a higher tax on car purchases, a higher tax on car insurance, higher fees to register vehicles, higher fines for traffic offenses, a new tax on auto repairs," January 21, 2006.
Washington Post, "Kaine vows veto of taxes for roads - only general fund, surplus would pay for transportation," June 24, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot, "Kaine’s transportation plan cool on new taxes," June 24, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot, "Kaine, Kilgore outline plans for transportation spending," June 25, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot editorial, "Kaine and Kilgore, safe and sorry," July 24, 2005.
The Washington Post, "Road plans of Kilgore, Kaine short on details," October 25, 2005.
The Washington Post, "Kaine vows veto of taxes for roads - only general fund, surplus would pay for transportation," June 24, 2005.
The Washington Post, "In Va., no-tax stands are not absolute," October 9, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot,"Kaine, Kilgore spar over taxes," October 10, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot editorial, "Kaine’s winding path to road progress," October 20, 2005.
The Virginian-Pilot, "Kaine to continue his push to protect state transportation fund from raiders," December 14, 2005.
The Washington Post, "It’s lawmaking time in the Old Dominion - For Kaine’s first session, transportation tops agenda," January 5, 2006.
The Virginian-Pilot,"The battles of Richmond," January 8, 2006.
The Virginian-Pilot,"Kaine offers ideas but few specifics," January 17, 2006.
The Roanoke Times, "Kaine unveils road map," January 21, 2006.
The Virginian-Pilot,"The proposal: increase transportation spending, To pay for it: taxes, fees, fines," January 21, 2006.
The Washington Post, "Rival Va. road plans costly but could ease commutes," January 22, 2006.
The Washington Post, "Kaine plan to shield funds is criticized - transit money transfers at issue," January 23, 2006.
Richmond Times-Dispatch editorial, "A mystery," December 12, 2008.
Richmond Times-Dispatch letter to the editor from A. Donald McEachin, "On taxes, Kaine kept his word," Dec. 22, 2008.
Richmond Times-Dispatch editorial, "Credibility," December 22, 2008.
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.