Stand up for the facts!
Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.
I would like to contribute
U.S. Rep. Connie Mack IV, R-Fort Myers, has been the target of attacks for missing votes while campaigning for Senate this year.
In a debate against his Democratic opponent Sen. Bill Nelson on Oct. 17, 2012, Mack defended himself by saying that his career voting record was on par with Nelson’s. Mack started in Congress in 2005, while Nelson served in the House between 1979 and 1990 and then joined the Senate in 2001.
Here’s what they said at the debate:
Nelson: "Speaking of votes why don’t you explain how you don’t show up to work? Why don’t you explain how this year you have one of the worst voting records. I have missed one vote this year. You have missed 178...."
Mack: "As far as my voting record, Senator, you should be straight with people. I’ve got a 94 percent voting record. You’ve got a 92 percent voting record."
We will fact-check Mack’s claim that he’s got "a 94 percent voting record" for his career in Congress, while Bill Nelson has "a 92 percent voting record."
Missed votes in 2012
This fight over voting records started earlier in the debate when Nelson claimed that he only missed one vote while Mack missed 178, which meant he has "one of the worst voting records." We ruled that claim Mostly True; we’ll briefly recap our findings.
GovTrack.us tracks missed votes for members of Congress using voting information from the official websites of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. It shows that for the first three quarters of this year, Mack missed 178 votes. Nelson’s one missed vote this year was to confirm the nomination of a federal judge in Illinois, which passed 86-1 on May 14.
Mack’s missed votes for this year put him in 13th place for members of Congress who have missed the most votes during the past two years, according to the New York Times’ Inside Congress database.
But it’s no surprise that Mack missed more votes than Nelson this year. While Nelson had token primary opposition, Mack faced serious primary challengers.
In July, Mack campaign spokesman David James said that Mack missed votes "to make sure Mitt Romney won the Florida presidential primary in January, something Connie's constituents felt very strongly about when it comes to invoking the change we need in Washington."
Missed votes throughout career
Looking at sheer vote numbers isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison because the House takes more votes than the Senate.
So we also looked at the percentage of missed votes for Mack’s tenure and Nelson’s Senate tenure.
From the start of Mack’s tenure in January 2005, he missed 6 percent of roll call votes -- that’s how Mack can claim that he has a 94 percent voting record. During Nelson’s Senate tenure starting in January 2001, he missed 1 percent. The median missed votes for all members was 2.5 percent.
But Mack’s claim that Nelson had a 92 percent voting record -- or missed 8 percent of votes -- refers to his term in the House (1979-1990) plus his term in the Senate starting in 2001.
Here’s why Mack likes to throw in those earlier years for Nelson: When Nelson campaigned for governor in 1990, he missed 56 percent of his votes.
Mack campaign consultant Gary Maloney sent us a spreadsheet showing Nelson’s missed votes and his voting participation rate each year based on Congressional Quarterly data. According to that data, Nelson participated about 92 percent of the time.
We contacted CQ directly, and they could not immediately verify the raw number of votes but did provide the percentage of missed votes each year, and that averaged out to about 92 percent, too. (Note that averaging the percentage each year isn’t a true average, because the total number of votes changed each year, but it likely provides a close approximation.)
We sent our findings to the Nelson campaign and they did not dispute the numbers.
Mack said that his own career voting participation rate is 94 percent, while Nelson’s is 92 percent. The available data supports those numbers.
Both candidates have political reasons for times when they missed votes: Nelson missed more than half of his votes in 1990 when he ran for governor. Mack missed about 30 percent so far this year running for Senate.
So while Nelson criticized Mack for missed votes this year, Nelson has also missed votes in the past, and their career voting rates are roughly equivalent. We rate this claim True.
PolitiFact, "Bill Nelson says Connie Mack missed a lot of votes this year,"Oct. 17, 2012
PolitiFact,"Dave Weldon says Connie Mack missed ‘almost half’ of his votes in Congress this year,"July 25, 2012
PolitiFact, "Connie Mack says Bill Nelson missed 56 percent of his votes -- in 1990,"July 26, 2012
Tampa Bay Times The Buzz blog, Weldon robocall rips Mack for missing votes, July 22, 2012
Tampa Bay Times The Buzz blog,"Missed votes could be an issue for U.S. Rep. Mack as U.S. Sen. campaign heats up," Feb. 3, 2012
Tampa Bay Times The Buzz blog, "Connie Mack competing with Charlie Rangel for most missed votes,"July 24, 2012
Miami Herald, "Campaign pressures McCollum candidate: Senate run restricts voting in House," Accessed in Nexis, Oct. 16, 2000
POLITCO, "Connie Mack skips out on big votes, hits trail instead,"April 17, 2012
George LeMieux for U.S. Senate, Radio ad, March 14, 2012
GovTrack.us, Missed votes for U.S. Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fort Myers), Accessed July 23, 2012
GovTrack.us, Missed votes for U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Florida), Accessed July 23, 2012
CQ Roll Call, Data showing missed votes for Bill Nelson in the House and Senate, Accessed Oct. 18, 2012
New York Times Inside Congress, Top house vote missers, Accessed Oct. 17, 2012
Interview, Derek Willis, New York Times reporter, Oct. 17, 2012
Interview, Joshua Tauberer, president of Civic Impulse which created the GovTrack.us website, Oct. 17, 2012
Interview, Gary Maloney, Connie Mack campaign consultant, Oct. 17, 2012
Interview, David Meyers, CQ managing editor of member information and research, Oct. 18, 2012
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.