Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
When General Electric announced plans to cut hundreds of jobs in Waukesha, company executives blamed Congress for failing to renew an obscure federal agency, the Export-Import Bank.
Led by a group of conservatives, the House of Representatives over the summer of 2015 efused to reauthorize funding for the bank, which helps U.S. companies sell their goods and services in foreign countries by providing financing for export deals.
Those opposed to the bank say it amounts to corporate welfare, while GE officials and other business leaders say it helps the playing field for U.S. companies competing in the global marketplace.
Balancing those business interests with a desire for a smaller federal government can create some political complications -- including for U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican.
Johnson defeated Democratic U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold in 2010 with support of the tea party conservatives who strongly oppose the bank. He faces a tough rematch against Feingold in 2016.
Time to to our Flip-O-Meter, which examines whether a politician has changed position on an issue. Our requisite reminder: It does not measure whether any change is good or bad policy or politics, only whether the candidate has been consistent.
The Wisconsin picture
The bank has been in the news in Wisconsin thanks to the Sept. 28, 2015 announcement by GE that it would cut 350 jobs at its Waukesha operation, which makes engines for the oil and gas industry. The company said it would build a new factory and move the work to Canada because that country has an export credit agency.
By that time, Johnson had already voted to support its reauthorization. In the wake of the GE news, Johnson told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he had heard from companies that benefitted from the bank and call it an important tool to help them do business overseas.
"They really could not get financing in the private sector for some of their products they wanted to export overseas," Johnson said.
Johnson also expressed satisfaction with proposed reforms to the way the bank is operated, including increased reserves to protect against loan losses.
In short, the senator said, he changed his mind.
Despite the Senate action, the bank is in limbo because the House adjourned before taking the matter up, although a reauthorization vote is could come as soon as Oct. 26, 2015.
Johnson was not the only high profile politician to change his views on the bank.
Former Texas governor and Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry did a switch in the other direction. He was for the bank in 2014, and then then against it a year later, in the midst of his short-lived presidential campaign.
That was rated a Full Flop by PolitiFact Texas.
In an op-ed column published by the Wall Street Journal, Perry noted that since since 2007, more than 1,200 Texas companies had obtained help from the Ex-Im Bank in financing more than $24 billion in exports.
Still, Perry wrote, he "can't get on board" with reauthorizing the charter for the 80-year-old bank: "I have been deeply disturbed by recent revelations of corruption and bribery at the institution."
Unlike Perry, Johnson has more than a rhetorical say in the future of the Export-Import Bank. He voted on reauthorization twice in the Senate. First against it, then for it.
And that’s a Full Flop.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "Workers in Waukesha losing jobs as GE takes strong stance in Ex-Im Bank dispute," Oct. 2, 2015
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "GE to stop making engines in Waukesha, cut 350 jobs," Sept. 28, 2015
PolitiFact Texas, "Rick Perry flip flops on support for Export-Import bank," May 7, 2015
The Wall Street Journal, "Why I’m changing my mind and opposing the Ex-Im Bank," May 5, 2015
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.