Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Eric Greitens
stated on September 30, 2016 in a press release:
Chris Koster "opposed protecting the women of Missouri" because he "was one of only four senators to vote against" a bill ending the practice of making rape victims pay for their own rape kits.
true half-true
Ellen Cagle
By Ellen Cagle November 2, 2016

Greitens misses bigger picture on Koster's domestic violence vote

In a September press release, Eric Greitens, Missouri’s Republican candidate for governor, said his opponent, Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster, voted against legislation protecting women from sexual assault and domestic violence.

Greitens said Koster voted against a 2007 bill mandating that the state pay for "rape kit" medical exams, not the victim of the assault. Koster was a state senator at the time the bill was proposed."

Chris Koster is always quick to tout his ‘experience.’ But he is totally silent about his record on issues related to sex crimes and violence against women, probably because it is so bad," the release reads.

It continues: "He opposed protecting the women of Missouri."

We wanted to know more about Koster’s stance on the bill, so we decided to investigate Greitens’ claim.

More about the bill

The legislation, House Bill 583, became law. Besides mandating that the state paid for rape kits, the bill also classified repeated instances of first-degree domestic assault as a Class A felony and established a designated address for sexual assault victims in order to protect their privacy.

Greitens is right — Koster was one of four senators who voted against the bill. The Senate passed it with a vote of 29-4. It passed in the House 133-19.

But Greitens’ release doesn’t provide the full story.

We reached out to Koster’s campaign, who sent us a statement about why Koster opposed the bill.

"The idea Attorney General Koster wants rape victims to pay for their own rape kits is beyond ludicrous," the statement read.

"This bill contained a blanket provision that could allow convicted murderers whose trials occurred decades earlier to get out of prison, based on potentially manufactured evidence. He couldn't support that and for that reason opposed the bill," the Koster campaign said.

The bill allows the Department of Corrections to grant parole to inmates serving time in prison for murdering their spouse or "domestic partner" if the inmate can prove that he or she was the victim of repeated domestic violence. To get parole, the inmate must provide evidence of domestic violence, and that evidence could not have been used in the original trial.

According to the bill, the evidence could include "witness statements, hospital records, social services records, and law enforcement records."

The provision allows parole only if the inmate has served 15 years of his or her sentence. The parole board must determine that the prisoner will not break the law again. The inmate’s trial had to have begun before 1991, and the homicide has to have been the person’s first violent felony conviction.

Featured Fact-check

Koster’s campaign staff said Koster objected to witness statements being used as evidence of domestic abuse leading to the murder. Koster’s position was that under the wording of the bill, the parole board and not the original jury would decide the prisoner’s fate on the basis of the witness statements.

"The bill doesn't provide a standard where the parole board weights (sic) the evidence, i.e. preponderance or without a reasonable doubt. This opens the door to manufactured evidence that would not be weighed by a jury," his campaign said.

The Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence supported the bill when it was in the legislature, said Colleen Coble, the coalition’s CEO.

Coble said the bill’s aim was to allow imprisoned women who killed their partners following an act of domestic violence to have their cases reviewed by the parole board. Before 1991, evidence of domestic violence was not commonly presented as a defense in court, she said.

Coble said Koster was supportive of the bill’s other provisions, including the measure to have the state pay for medical exams.

Koster’s voting record

We wanted to find out more about how Koster voted on other legislation related to sexual violence when he was a state senator. Koster’s staff provided us with more information.

As attorney general, Koster assembled the Domestic Violence Task Force in 2010. The task force suggested 12 changes to Missouri’s domestic violence laws in a 2011 report to the Missouri General Assembly. One of the recommendations was to create more consistent definitions of "domestic violence," "abuse," "adult," "family" and "household member."Some of the suggestions were folded into a Senate bill that became law that year.

As a state senator, Koster sponsored several bills related to sexual assault, though none became law.

In 2006, he sponsored a bill that would increase penalties for sexual offenders who fail to register. That year, he also sponsored a bill that would have required lifetime probation for first-time sex offenders.

In 2007, he sponsored a bill that would allow victims of sexual assault to register a designated address with the Missouri Secretary of State’s office to protect their privacy. That was one of the provisions of the bill Greitens referenced.

He also sponsored a bill that year requiring people convicted of felonies to serve a minimum of three years in prison if they failed to register as a sex offender at the time of their crime as required.

Our ruling

Greitens says Koster voted against a 2007 bill requiring the state to pay for rape victims’ medical exams.

In reality, the bill did more than that.

Koster says he objected to wording that made it possible for convicted murderers to be granted parole by claiming they were victims of domestic abuse. Koster said the language made it possible for murderers to manufacture evidence to be released before the completion of their sentence.

Greitens is cherry-picking one part of the legislation to paint his opponent as soft on domestic abuse. We rate his claim Half True.

Our Sources

Greitens misses bigger picture on Koster's domestic violence vote

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up