Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.

Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.

More Info

I would like to contribute

The U.S. Capitol dome at dusk on May 3, 2020. (AP) The U.S. Capitol dome at dusk on May 3, 2020. (AP)

The U.S. Capitol dome at dusk on May 3, 2020. (AP)

Louis Jacobson
By Louis Jacobson May 4, 2020

Claim about congressional pensions is wrong, once again

If Your Time is short

• Retired lawmakers don’t receive full pay as their pension, and in most cases they won’t be vested after serving just one term in office.

• The earliest any retired lawmaker could start receiving a pension is 50 years of age.

• Even for the longest-serving lawmakers, federal law caps pensions at 80% of full salary.

A specious claim that’s been making the rounds for about two decades has recently resurfaced: that members of Congress can receive a pension equal to their full pay after serving just one term.

But it’s no more accurate now than it ever was.

A Facebook post says, "No one has been able to explain to me why young men and women who serve in the U.S. Military for 20 years, risking their lives protecting freedom, … only get 50% of their base pay. While politicians hold their political positions in the safe confines of the capital, protected by these same men and women, and receive full pay retirement after serving 1 term! Re-post if you believe this is absolutely WRONG."

The part about military pensions is somewhat accurate, but incomplete and outdated. However, the part about pensions for politicians — which we take to mean congressional pensions, since few executive branch politicians serve "terms" — is flat-out wrong.

Here, we’ll tackle both parts of the claim.

U.S. Marines near a military base in al-Hamra, United Arab Emirates, on March 23, 2020. (AP)

Military pensions

For years, the Facebook post’s description of the military pension would have been in the ballpark.

If you joined the military before September 1980, you get 50% of your final base pay after 20 years of service, or 100% of base pay if you retire after 40 years.

If you joined between September 1980 and July 1986, you would be subject to the same percentages but a slightly different formula. Your pension would be based on the average of your three highest pay years, rather than your final base pay.

If you joined between August 1986 and December 2017, you could choose between the previous option or a plan under which you get a bonus on your 15th service anniversary in exchange for a lower retirement pay.

Under each of the systems above, a service member would qualify for a pension only after many years of service. Those with shorter military careers, who by some estimates account for about 80 percent of service members, would get no pension at all.

That changed under a new law that took effect in 2018. It governs pensions for individuals who entered the military starting that year. 

Under this system, service members get pensions equivalent to 40% of their base pay after 20 years. But service members would also have a Thrift Savings Plan, which is similar to a 401(k), and after two years, the military would match contributions up to 5%. For the first time, service members will have a plan that can be rolled over after they leave the military, even if their departure comes just a few years after they sign up.

So the current military pension system is more complex than the Facebook post suggests, but the post does roughly reflect the system.

Featured Fact-check

Congressional pensions

However, the post’s description of congressional pensions is simply inaccurate.

Members elected prior to 1984 belong to a pension program known as the Civil Service Retirement System. But only five current House members and two senators were elected prior to 1984, so the vast majority belong to the successor plan, known as the Federal Employees’ Retirement System. 

The latter plan isn’t just for lawmakers; it’s available to every federal employee. It includes Social Security, a pension and the Thrift Savings Plan. (Read a summary of the system on the website of the nonpartisan Congressional Institute and in this report by the Congressional Research Service.)

Under either plan, a member of Congress can receive a pension only after serving for five years, although previous service as a federal employee can count toward that five-year vesting period. To be eligible, lawmakers must contribute part of their salary into the pension plan while they’re in Congress.

To collect, the lawmaker must be age 62, or be at least age 50 with 20 years of federal service, or be any age with 25 years of service. (The Constitution dictates a minimum age of 25 years for House members and 30 for senators.)

Under the current pension law, the size of the pension is based on the highest three years of a member's salary, the number of years of service and a multiplier, which is 1.7% for the first 20 years of service and 1% for subsequent years.

Here’s an example, using a typical 25-year rank-and-file member who retired this year:

The pension would be the sum of two calculations. First, multiply $174,000 (which is the average salary over the last three years) times 20 years times 0.017. Then, multiply $174,000 times 5 years times 0.01 and add that number to the first calculation. The total: about $67,860 per year.

A three-term congressman (or one-term senator) who has now reached retirement age would be eligible for an annual pension of $17,745 for six years of work. That's generous, but not close to full pay.

In fact, federal law prevents members of Congress from getting full pay as their pension. By law, the starting amount of a member's retirement annuity may not exceed 80% of his or her final salary.

Under the formula, it would take 67 years of federal service to hit that 80% limit. For context, no House member or senator has ever served more than 60 years in office.

So, to recap: Retired lawmakers don’t "receive full pay" for their pension, and unless they were already a federal employee for three years before entering Congress, they wouldn’t be vested after serving just "1 term." And the earliest anyone could start receiving a pension is 50 years of age.

Our ruling

The Facebook post said, politicians "receive full pay retirement after serving 1 term!"

The description of the military pension is in the ballpark, but incomplete and somewhat outdated.

However, the description of the congressional pension is thoroughly inaccurate. Retired lawmakers don’t "receive full pay" for their pension, and unless they were already a federal employee for three years before entering Congress, they wouldn’t be vested after serving just "1 term." Meanwhile, the earliest any retired lawmaker could start receiving a pension is 50 years of age.

We rate the statement False.

Correction, May 6, 2020: This version corrects the pension calculations in the examples for the 25-year and five-year member of Congress. The rating remains the same.

Our Sources

Facebook post, April 13, 2020

Defense Department, "Military Compensation," accessed May 3, 2020

Military.com, "Computing Retired Military Pay," accessed May 3, 2020

Ballotpedia, list of current members of Congress, accessed May 3, 2020

Congressional Research Service, "Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress," Aug. 8, 2019

Congressional Institute, "Busting Congressional Myths," Sept. 9, 2018

New York Times, "The Military’s New Retirement Option," Sept. 12, 2019

Snopes.com, "Congressional pensions," Sept. 5, 2009

PolitiFact, "Can members of Congress retire with full pay after just one term?" Jan. 11, 2013

FactCheck.org, "Congressional Pensions Update," Jan. 5, 2015

Email interview with Jessica R. Towhey, spokeswoman for the Congressional Institute, May 1, 2020

Email interview with Demian Brady, director of research at the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, May 1, 2020

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Louis Jacobson

Claim about congressional pensions is wrong, once again

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up