Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
If Your Time is short
• The post refers to a real provision in the CARES Act that eases restrictions passed in 2017 that limited how extensively pass-through corporations can apply business losses to the owner’s individual tax burden.
• Congress’ official tax arbiter pegged the 10-year cost of the provision at $135 billion, and that committee also projected that 43,000 taxpayers who earn more than $1 million a year would benefit.
• The provision also benefits 87,000 taxpayers earning less than $1 million a year.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act was a roughly $2 trillion bill passed in March that provided economic assistance to everyone from unemployed workers and beleaguered small businesses to overwhelmed hospitals and state governments. Was it also a giveaway to millionaires?
Yes, according to a May 14 Facebook post.
Using simple text on a black background, the post says: "Hidden in the CARES Act was an obscure $135 billion tax break for 43,000 millionaires. Apparently, no one asked, ‘How are we going to pay for it?’"
It was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)
The post is more or less on target.
The CARES Act, which sailed through both houses of Congress, did include language that temporarily suspended a tax provision known as the excess loss limitation. The language is not hidden, but it’s safe to say that given how fast the $2 trillion bill sped through Congress, it mostly escaped media attention.
The excess loss limitation was part of the 2017 tax overhaul bill signed by President Donald Trump. It applied to pass-through businesses, which are companies whose profits are reported on the owner’s individual returns, and taxed as individual income, rather than being subject to corporate taxes.
The 2017 provision limited how much in business losses a business owner could claim to lower the taxes on their non-business income.
The temporary provision in the CARES Act suspended those limits, meaning business owners could deduct business losses without a limitation on the amount and could apply those losses to past or future tax years.
After this provision in a very big bill came to light, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, offered bills to roll back the temporary suspension of the tax limitation that was included in the CARES Act.
The "$135 billion tax break" figure in the Facebook post is backed up by the analysis by the bipartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, the official arbiter of the cost of tax proposals considered by Congress.
In its analysis of the CARES Act, the committee found that the tax provision would cost the Treasury about $135 billion between 2020 and 2030, with the bulk of the cost occurring in the first two years, and small gains coming in later years.
As for the 43,000 millionaires figure, that comes from an analysis requested by Whitehouse and Doggett that showed the estimated impact of the provision on different income groups. It was included in a letter that the committee sent to the two lawmakers.
The committee found 43,000 taxpayers earning $1 million or more would indeed benefit from the provision, and they would reap nearly 82% of the total money saved.
Notably, this is a tiny group. While the term "millionaires" is often defined as people whose net worth is north of $1 million, this table refers to Americans earning $1 million a year in income, a much rarer accomplishment.
Other taxpayers below the $1 million income group would also benefit — 87,000 in all — although to a smaller extent.
Tax experts say there is a logic to making a change to loss limitations during a dire economic situation.
Steve Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, said that while he believes the provision in the CARES Act is too generous, he does see some benefit to a scaled-back suspension.
Allowing such taxpayers to carry back net losses "makes it possible for firms and individuals to generate cash quickly by effectively amending a past-year return and use current losses to lower prior-year taxes," he wrote in a recent blog post.
Other tax specialists say the provision is more than just a giveaway to the rich.
Kyle Pomerleau, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said that loss deductions "are an essential part of a well-functioning income tax. Businesses typically make multi-year investments. Those investments may lose money in some years and make money in other years. The ability to either carry back losses to offset previous years’ taxes or carry forward losses to offset future taxes ensures that the tax system accurately measures income."
This is especially important during recessions, Pomerleau said, because they help provide stressed companies with liquidity. "To the extent this allows firms to hold on to a few more workers than they otherwise would have, it might benefit lower-income individuals more than the tables suggest," he said.
The Facebook post said, "Hidden in the CARES Act was an obscure $135 billion tax break for 43,000 millionaires."
This refers to a real provision in the CARES Act that eases restrictions passed in 2017 that limited how extensively pass-through corporations can apply business losses to the owner’s individual tax burden.
Congress’ official tax arbiter pegged the 10-year cost of the provision at $135 billion, and that committee also projected that 43,000 taxpayers earning more than $1 million a year would benefit.
However, it’s worth noting that 87,000 taxpayers earning less than that would also benefit.
We rate the statement Mostly True.
Congress.gov, H.R. 6579 main page
Congress.gov, S. 3640 main page
Joint Committee on Taxation, letter to Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Doggett, April 9, 2020
Joint Committee on Taxation, "Estimated revenue effects of the revenue provisions contained in an amendment in the nature of substitute to H.R. 748," April 23, 2020
Steve Rosenthal and Aravind Boddupalli, "Heads I Win, Tails I Win Too: Winners From The Tax Relief For Losses In The CARES Act," April 20, 2020
Kyle Pomerleau, "Loss deductions are not a bailout," May 21, 2020
Sheldon Whitehouse, press release, April 14, 2020
Email interview with Kyle Pomerleau, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, May 21, 2020
Interview with Steve Rosenthal, senior fellow at the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, May 22, 2020
Email interview with Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, May 22, 2020
Read About Our Process
Says Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted, “It’s ‘odd’ that the ANTIFA insurgency happened just as COVID-19 loses steam It’s ‘odd’ that COVID-19 happened the moment impeachment failed. It’s ‘odd’ that impeachment happened the moment Russian hoax failed. The Russian hoax happened because Hillary lost? Notice the pattern?”
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.