Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Gov. Rick Perry's campaign landed a Nutcracker-like leap in December by suggesting that Republican U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison enabled Democrats to advance their health-care package by voting for the Senate to take up an unrelated spending proposal.
Hutchison's vote caused a small stir back home. Texas "tea party" activists gathered outside Hutchison's offices in Austin, Houston and Dallas.
Perry spokesman Mark Miner said Dec. 20: "After promising to fight health care, Sen. Hutchison abandoned Republicans and stood with Democrats to ensure health care legislation would pass quickly."
But is that the way it happened in Washington? We decided to check Perry's version of events.
True, Hutchison voted with the majority Democrats in favor of the Senate taking up the defense appropriation.
Early on Dec. 19, Democratic leaders amassed more than the 60 votes needed under Senate rules to proceed to action on the measure. Outnumbered Republicans had hoped to keep members stewing on the defense plan, thereby putting off action on the looming health care legislation.
The vote kept the Senate on a schedule that allowed the Democrats to bring up the health care overhaul. On Christmas Eve, the Senate passed it.
By Perry's analysis, Hutchison's vote eased the Democrats' passage of the health care bill she opposed. Perry's campaign posted several videos online including the version we're showing to the right musically casting Hutchison as flip-flopping. The video includes a snippet showing Hutchison telling colleagues before the vote that its early-morning timing was being driven by the "underlying" health care legislation.
Remember, Democrats needed only 60 votes to stay on their schedule. We found that Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, voting at 1:14 a.m., provided the crucial 60th vote in favor of action on the defense bill.
One minute later, two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both of Maine — voted "aye." Video broadcast on C-SPAN2 shows Hutchison voting "aye" at 1:16 a.m.
At 1:20 a.m., the final tally was read: 63 Yeas, 33 Nays.
Most Republicans — including Hutchison — then joined Democrats in passing the spending measure, 88-10.
Did Hutchison's procedural vote in any way ensure the Democrats' health care legislation would pass quickly?
We don't see how. The Perry campaign hasn't offered evidence to prove Hutchison blessed the Democratic health plan in any way other than casting a vote on that defense bill after the outcome was determined.
Asked why Hutchison signed off on taking up the earlier spending measure -- surely knowing her vote might generate sparks back home -- Hutchison spokesman Joe Pounder said: "After the Democrats had their 60, Sen. Hutchison felt it was important to register her vote for our defense priorities."
Significantly, Hutchison later joined fellow Republicans and voted against passage of the Democratic health plan.
In claiming that Hutchison paved the way for the Democratic health bill, the Perry campaign leaped to a conclusion not supported by the facts. We give the Perry campaign's statement a ruling of Pants on Fire.
Video of U.S. Senate vote, Dec. 19, 2009, C-SPAN2, posted by Rick Perry gubernatorial campaign, viewed Dec. 23, 2009
Interview, Joe Pounder, spokesman, Kay Bailey Hutchison campaign, Dec. 23, 2009
Interview, Mark Miner, spokesman, Rick Perry campaign, Dec. 23, 2009
U.S. Senate, vote on motion to concur in House amendments to Senate amendments to H.R. 3326 (Department of Defense Appropriation), Dec. 19, 2009
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.