Stand up for the facts!

Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Linda Qiu
By Linda Qiu November 2, 2015

Donald Trump's fracked-up claim on shale's economic impact in Ohio

In the third Republican debate, Donald Trump and Ohio Gov. John Kasich got into a fracas over fracking.  

It started when debate moderator John Harwood asked Kasich whom he was talking about when Kasich said he’s been hearing "crazy" things on the campaign trail. Kasich didn’t name names but listed proposals from the two outsiders leading the GOP field, specifically Trump’s plan to deport 10 million people and Ben Carson’s tithe-based tax policy.

"Folks, we’ve got to wake up. We cannot elect somebody who doesn’t know how to do the job," Kasich said on Oct. 28.

Trump fired back that Kasich’s record in Ohio wasn’t so good.

"First of all, John got lucky with a thing called fracking, okay?" Trump retorted. "He hit oil. He got lucky with fracking. Believe me, that is why Ohio is doing well."

"Ohio does have an energy industry, but we’re diversified," Kasich said in response.  

Who was right? We reached out to the Trump camp but didn’t hear back. The data suggests and experts told us, however, that Trump is grossly exaggerating fracking’s role in Ohio’s economy.

The numbers

To refresh, fracking or hydraulic fracturing is the process of blasting pressurized water, sand and chemicals to extract natural gas from shale rock miles underground. Ohio, the birthplace of Standard Oil and the leading producer of crude oil a century ago, sits on parts of two major shale formations.

Drilling began in the Utica and Marcellus shales in eastern Ohio in 2010, when the state was facing a projected budget shortfall and when Kasich was elected to office. Ohio is now running a $2 billion surplus.

Statistics show that fracking contributed to both jobs and tax revenues in Ohio, but the numbers aren’t overwhelming.

Kasich’s spokesperson Rob Nichols pointed to data showing that fracking was responsible for just 2.6 percent of the 278,150 total jobs created in the state during that time period.

As for revenue, Nichols said data from Ohio’s Department of Taxation shows that oil and gas industry brought 0.017 percent ($19.89 million) of all state revenue ($118.3 billion) between fiscal years 2014 to 2015.

Our own analysis produced similar results. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we found that fracking accounted for 2.3 to 2.5 percent of all jobs created in Ohio between 2010 and 2014. Factoring in jobs created in related industries (i.e. petrochemical engineering or pipe manufacturing) brings up the figure up to 6.9 to 7.9 percent of all jobs.

As for revenue, we looked at Ohio Department of Taxation’s annual reports and found that the severance tax imposed on the oil and gas industry contributed to less than 1 percent of tax revenue in Ohio from 2010 to 2014.

Policy Matters Ohio, a Cleveland-based liberal think tank, estimates a slightly lower impact. According to their analysis of BLS data, shale jobs represented about 0.26 percent of total employment in Ohio in the first quarter of 2015, and about 2 percent of total jobs added between 2010 and 2015. By comparison, the auto industry added about three and a half times more jobs.

Featured Fact-check

"I’ll admit that I tweeted in outrage at (Trump’s) statement since both parts of it are inaccurate and not borne out by the data," said Amy Hanauer, the think tank’s executive director, who also contends that Ohio is actually not doing well.

Shale dreams deferred

At the beginning of the fracking boom, the oil and gas industry hailed it as "the biggest thing economically to hit Ohio since maybe the plow," in the words of one executive. Shale development, according to industry officials, would bring an estimated $500 billion and 200,000 jobs to the state.

But fracking wasn’t as profitable in Ohio as expected, thanks to a slump in the oil prices coupled with low production.

"I would say the growth has been slower than we originally anticipated," an oil refinery official acknowledged in 2012, according to Reuters.

"Nothing like those numbers had been seen," said Hanauer. "Employment even in the drilling counties was, at that time, below pre-recession levels.  Sales tax revenue was up significantly, a good thing, but many of those who have found jobs were from out of state."

A 2012 economic analysis sponsored by pro-industry entities — the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and the Ohio Shale Coalition — estimated that shale development would, by 2014, result in an additional 65,000 jobs and just a 1 percent improvement to the state GDP.

The 1 percent estimate was "pretty much on target," according to report co-author Douglas Southgate, a professor emeritus of environmental economics and public policy at Ohio State University who says he’s pro-fracking.

The overall employment impact, meanwhile, "has been small enough that not even OOGA — the Ohio Oil and Gas Association — has been talking about it," Southgate told us.

Even if oil prices pick up again and fracking’s impact grows, its role in Ohio’s economy wouldn’t be as large as Trump is trumpeting it to be.

"Ohio has a far more diverse economy than, say, North Dakota or Oklahoma," said Andrew Thomas of Cleveland State University’s Energy Policy Center, the principal investigator of the 2012 report. "I am skeptical that all growth in the state can be attributed to the oil and gas industry alone."

Kasich’s campaign forwarded us a report from JobsOhio, the state’s privatized economic development agency, to that point:

For the record, not even the drillers themselves back Trump’s claim. Here’s a statement Shawn Bennett, the executive vice president of the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, provided to PolitiFact:

"While we appreciate Mr. Trump acknowledging the significant and positive economic impacts that oil and gas development has had on Ohio, we can not take credit for all of the economic growth that has taken place during Gov. Kasich's tenure."

Our ruling

Trump said, "John (Kasich) got lucky with a thing called fracking," which "is why Ohio is doing well".

Though Ohio underwent a fracking boom in recent years, Trump is overstating its impact on Ohio’s economy. By all estimates, fracking jobs account for 2 percent of those added in the state during Kasich’s tenure. Shale development has improved GDP by about 1 percent and contributed to less than a percent of the state’s tax revenue.

Not even the drillers themselves back Trump’s claim. We rate it False.

Our Sources

Washington Post, "The third Republican debate transcript, annotated," Oct. 28, 2015

Bureau of Labor Statistics query

Ohio Department of Taxation annual reports 2010 to 2014

PolitiFact, "John Kasich: 'I took the state of Ohio from an $8 billion hole … to a $2 billion surplus'" Aug. 6, 2015

Cleveland State University, "An Analysis of the Economic Potential for Shale  Formations in Ohio," 2012

Email interviews with Rob Nichols, spokesperson for John Kasich, Oct. 29, 2015

Email and phone interviews with Douglas Southgate, emeritus professor of environmental economics and public policy at Ohio State University, Oct. 29, 2015

Email interview with Andrew Thomas, executive-in-residence at the Energy Policy Center at Cleveland State University, Oct. 29, 2015

Email interview with Amy Hanauer, executive director at Policy Matters Ohio, Oct. 29, 2015

Email interview with Mike Chadsey, spokesperson for the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, Oct. 29, 2015

Ohio Dept. of Job and Family Services, 2012 Annual Ohio Shale Report, August 2013

Ohio Dept. of Job and Family Services, 2013 Annual Ohio Shale Report, December 2014

Ohio Dept. of Job and Family Services, 2014 Annual Ohio Shale Report, July 2015

Cleveland State University, Ohio Utica Shale Gas Monitor, Jan. 10, 2014

Cleveland State University, Ohio Utica Shale Region Monitor, March 2014

Policy Matters Ohio, Assessing the Impacts of Shale Drilling: Four Community Case Studies, April 2014

Policy Matters Ohio, Six-state study finds jobs impact of fracking exaggerated by industry and supporters, Nov. 21, 2013

New York Times, "Boom in Energy Spurs Industry in the Rust Belt," Sept. 9, 2014

CNN, "Ohio set to see oil boom thanks to fracking," Dec. 20, 2011

Columbus Dispatch, "Fracking: So where’s the economic boom that was promised?" Jan. 28, 2014

Reuters, "Ohio Energy Data Regulations Make It One Of Nation's Least Transparent States," Oct. 22, 2022

PBS, "Differing views on fracking’s impact," April 24, 2013

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Linda Qiu

Donald Trump's fracked-up claim on shale's economic impact in Ohio

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up