The United States outsources the process of sending its military satellites into space, and to Russia no less, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said during a hearing on military space launches Jan. 27.
"Today Russia holds many of our most precious national security satellites at risk before they ever get off the ground," said McCain, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The context of McCain’s statements comes on the heels of legislation he introduced Thursday to repeal a provision that allows the government to use Russian-made rocket engines to send U.S. military satellites into space. The provision was reversed when Congress passed a $1.1 trillion spending bill, averting a government shutdown, in December.
He noted that using the Russian engines, RD-180s, benefits Russian President Vladimir Putin and his "gang of corrupt cronies." NPO Energomash produces the RD-180s. According to Russian Embassy spokesman Yury Melnik, NPO Energomash is managed by RKK Energiya, whose major stockholder is the Russian government.
Here are McCain’s full remarks:
"In stark contrast to the reviews under way for satellites already in space, the (Defense) Department appears less interested in rapidly addressing our most immediate threat: our reliance on Russian-made rocket engines. Today Russia holds many of our most precious national security satellites at risk before they ever get off the ground. Yet the Department of Defense has actively sought to undermine – with the support of United Launch Alliance (ULA) and the parochial motivations of Sen. (Richard) Shelby, R-Ala., and Sen. (Dick) Durbin, D-Ill. – the direction of this committee to limit that risk and end the use of the Russian made RD-180 by the end of this decade."
We wondered whether American satellites really take flight using Russian engines.
Cleared for takeoff
McCain press aide Julie Tarallo said the United States has relied on Russian engines in recent years, which independent experts confirmed.
Richard Bloom is the director of terrorism, intelligence and security studies at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott. He said the United States has used the RD-180s since 2000. The first flight occurred that year, according to Melnik.
"He’s certainly correct, the U.S. has been dependent on the Russian Federation," Bloom said.
While Bloom noted that "national security" can be defined in a multitude of ways, from 2000 to 2010 he said there were about 29 U.S. space launches using the RD-180.
"The Russian Federation has a valuable capability," he said.
ULA, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin that started in 2006, has a contract with the Air Force to launch the satellites.
They also use the RD-180s on their Atlas V rocket.
ULA spokeswoman Jessica Rye told PolitiFact/ABC 15 in a prepared statement via email that a new, American engine is "being developed."
With the space race behind us, using Russia’s help in the outer world is nothing new.
As we previously reported in a July 2011 fact-check of Republican presidential hopeful Marco Rubio, NASA has had a contract to pay the Russians to send someone to the International Space Station for more than a decade.
While NASA announced in September 2014 that American companies Boeing and SpaceX would work on transporting American astronauts to the Space Station, NASA spokesman Allard Beutel said the agency still has a contract with the Russians from 2018 through June 2020.
NASA astronauts have flown on Russian spacecrafts since the 1990s.
What’s the risk? That’s a bit harder to define.
In 2014, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin threatened to ban the export of Russian rockets to help fuel the U.S. satellite program. That would leave the United States without a way to get many of its satellites into space.
However, the Russians never followed through on that threat.
McCain said, "Today Russia holds many of our most precious national security satellites at risk before they ever get off the ground."
That’s correct, though the level to which that represents a risk, as McCain said, is somewhat unknown. Russia did at one point threaten to stop exporting the Russian-made engines fueling the U.S. satellite program. But it didn’t follow through.
The U.S. government’s goal is to eventually end this dependence on Russian-made engines, but, for now, that is not the case.
McCain’s statement is accurate but needs additional information. We rate it Mostly True.
Sen. John McCain, Remarks during a hearing on military space launches, Jan. 27, 2016
Interview with McCain press aide Julie Tarallo, Jan. 27-28, 2016
Associated Press, Sen. McCain assails Pentagon for relying on Russian rockets, Jan. 27, 2016
Associated Press, Pentagon defends use of Russian engines to launch satellites, Jan. 27 2016
Interview with Richard Bloom, director of terrorism, intelligence and security studies at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Jan. 28, 2016
Interview with Yury Melnik, Russian Embassy spokesman, Jan. 27-28, 2016
Interview with United Launch Alliance spokeswoman Jessica Rye, Jan. 27-28, 2016
NASA press release, NASA chooses American Companies to Transport U.S. Astronauts to International Space Station, Sept. 16, 2014
Interview with NASA spokesman Allard Beutel, Jan. 27-28, 2016
PolitiFact Florida, Marco Rubio says the United States will pay Russia $50 million per astronaut, July 13, 2011
The Wall Street Journal, Congress Passes $1.15 Trillion Spending Bill, Dec. 18, 2015
United Launch Alliance, "About ULA," accessed Jan. 28, 2016
United Launch Alliance, "Frequently Asked Questions - RD-180 Engine," accessed Jan. 28, 2016
Space.com Russia Calls for Ban of US Military Launches Using Russian Rocket Engines, May 13, 2014
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.