Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

By Anthony Cave July 27, 2016

Hillary Clinton claims immigrants are more successful at owning businesses than natives

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton portrayed immigrants as more successful at starting and running businesses than natives in a recent interview.

When Vox editor Ezra Klein asked Clinton if it would be good for the economy to increase immigration, Clinton gave a short answer: yes.

"It is certainly the case that immigration has been and continues to be good for our economy," Clinton said June 22 (the interview appeared online July 11). "Immigrants start businesses at a faster rate; they seem to grow those businesses more successfully."

Clinton’s statement on immigrant-owned businesses interested us.

Are immigrants really better than native-born Americans at starting — and growing — successful businesses?

What the data shows

Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin pointed us to analysis from the nonpartisan Kauffman Foundation that shows immigrants are almost "twice as likely" to start businesses than natives.

The foundation looked at monthly data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey from 1996 through 2014 and estimated that immigrants have a new entrepreneur rate of 52 percent compared to the native born rate of 27 percent.

Their analysis also addressed the success of these businesses, but only within a certain subset - venture-backed firms.

Immigrant founders from these companies have created about 150 jobs per company in the United States. According to the foundation, in 2011, 24 of the top 50 venture-backed businesses also had a least one foreign-born founder.

Experts we spoke with generally agreed with Clinton’s claim. Although, there are some caveats.

University of California, Santa Cruz economics professor Robert Fairlie, who authored a 2012 paper for the Small Business Administration on immigrant entrepreneurs, said that the success of these businesses is not as clear as the start-up data.

Featured Fact-check

"My estimates show that immigrants have a much higher business start rate than non-immigrants," Fairlie said. "There is also evidence showing that immigrant businesses are smaller on average than non-immigrant businesses."

A 2011 report from the bipartisan Partnership for a New American Economy notes that 40 percent of Fortune 500 companies are founded by an immigrant or the child of an immigrant. Although, when the former CEO of AOL repeated this claim, we rated it Half True -- a company’s dominance could be more attributable to recent leaders more so than its founders.

However, Clinton’s claim was not as definitive.

"Immigrants are indeed more likely than others to be business owners," said David Kallick, a senior fellow at the Fiscal Policy Institute. "The claims about business ownership are sometimes overstated, but from the Vox quote, I’d say Hillary is on the mark."

Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for stricter immigration policies, analyzed the Census Bureau’s 2015 Current Population Survey self-employment data by country for immigrants and natives.

He found that immigrants from some countries, such as Brazil and Germany, do have higher business ownership rates than natives. But immigrants from other countries do not.

Camarota said it is possible they start businesses at higher rates than natives, but "they fail at higher rates, too."

But, Colgate University economics professor Chad Sparber, an immigration economy expert, said Clinton’s claim is accurate, noting that federal data shows that immigrants are "almost always more likely" to be self-employed than natives.

"Though, self-employment isn’t necessarily the same thing as starting a business," Sparber said.

Our ruling

Clinton said, "immigrants start businesses at a faster rate; they seem to grow those businesses more successfully."

Federal data and the experts we spoke with back up her claim. While it’s important to note that evidence on the success of immigrant-owned businesses is limited, what we did find supports what Clinton said, that immigrants "seem" to grow their businesses better than their native counterparts.

We rate Clinton’s claim Mostly True.

Our Sources

Vox, "The Vox Conversation, Hillary Clinton," July 11, 2016

Kauffman Foundation, "Immigrant entrepreneurs: A path to U.S. economic growth," Jan. 22, 2015

Kauffman Foundation, "2015 The Kauffman Index: Startup Activity," accessed July 26, 2016

Small Business Administration, "Immigrant entrepreneurs and small business owners, and their access to financial capital," accessed July 26, 2016

Partnership for a New American Economy, "The ‘New American’ Fortune 500," accessed July 26, 2016

PolitiFact, "Steve Case says 40 percent of the Fortune 500 were started either by immigrants or children of immigrants," July 6, 2011

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Self-employment in the United States," accessed July 26, 2016

Interview with Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin, July 15, 2016

Interview with University of California, Santa Cruz economics professor Robert Fairlie, July 26, 2016

Interview with Fiscal Policy Institute senior fellow David Kallick, July 22, 2016

Interview with Center for Immigration Studies director of research Steven Camarota, July 15, 2016

Interview with Colgate University economics professor Chad Sparber, July 21, 2016

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Anthony Cave

Hillary Clinton claims immigrants are more successful at owning businesses than natives

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up