Says that in the 1985 election former Gov. Tom Kean had "the largest winning margin for a gubernatorial candidate in Jersey history."
Raymond Bateman on Friday, November 23rd, 2012 in a column
Raymond Bateman says Tom Kean won the 1985 gubernatorial election by largest margin in state’s history
If Newark Mayor Cory Booker declines to run for the state’s highest office, a former state legislator predicts a decisive -- possibly even historic -- re-election victory for Gov. Chris Christie
Raymond Bateman, a former Republican state senator and assemblyman who lost a bid for governor in 1977, said in a recent column that Booker seems like the only Democrat capable of foiling Christie’s prospects for a second term.
"Unless Booker gets into the race, 2013 reminds me of 1985. That was the year Tom Kean made history with the largest-ever New Jersey gubernatorial victory," Bateman wrote in a Nov. 23 column published in The Asbury Park Press. "Kean, who barely won (by 1,797 votes) in 1981, destroyed his 1985 opponent, Peter Shapiro, winning by a majority of more than 750,000 votes, the largest winning margin for a gubernatorial candidate in Jersey history."
"In any case," Bateman wrote later in his column, "2013 should see a political barn-burning election in New Jersey that I believe will produce a Kean-like victory for Christie if, in fact, he runs."
This week Christie announced he will seek a second term. Potential Democratic rivals -- including Booker -- have not formally declared their intentions.
The outcome of any matchup wouldn’t be determined until next year, but until then PolitiFact New Jersey wondered whether Bateman’s comparison was rooted in fact. Did Kean, a Republican, rebound from a close election to a historically decisive re-election bid?
The data -- whether it’s broken down by total votes or percentages -- shows that’s true.
More than 1.37 million New Jerseyans cast their vote for Kean that year, while Shapiro, the Democratic candidate and a former Essex County executive, won about 578,000 votes.
So Kean won by more than 790,000 votes, according to election data published in the state’s legislative manual.
No other governor in New Jersey’s history has won election by a larger margin.
In all, Kean won more than 69 percent of the vote, carrying every one of New Jersey’s 21 counties and all but three municipalities.
It’s worth noting that Kean’s sweeping victory came four years after he narrowly won office. In 1981 Kean defeated Democrat Jim Florio by fewer than 1,800 votes, which represented less than one twelfth of one percent of the total vote.
No other gubernatorial race was closer as a percentage of the total vote, though in 1880 the Democratic candidate won by only 651 votes. That accounted for about one-quarter of one percent of the total vote.
Bateman said that in the 1985 general election Kean had "the largest winning margin for a gubernatorial candidate in Jersey history."
Kean trounced his opponent that year.
The former Republican governor won more than 1.37 million votes, compared with the roughly 578,000 ballots cast for his Democratic rival.
That means Kean won by more than 790,000 votes. That’s the largest margin of victory for a gubernatorial election in New Jersey’s history.
We rate this statement True.
To comment on this ruling, go to NJ.com.
Published: Thursday, November 29th, 2012 at 7:30 a.m.
The Asbury Park Press, BATEMAN: Can anyone beat Christie?, Nov. 23, 2012
Interview with Raymond Bateman, Nov. 27, 2012
Fitzgerald’s Legislative Manual. State of New Jersey: 2011, pgs. 520-523
Fitzgerald’s Legislative Manual. State of New Jersey: 1986, pgs. 450-456
New Jersey Division of Elections, NJ Election Information and Results Archive, accessed Nov. 26, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Cory Booker says Gov. Christie's bid for re-election has no bearing on decision to run, Nov. 27, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Gov. Christie files papers to seek re-election next year, Nov. 26, 2012
We want to hear your suggestions and comments. Email the New Jersey Truth-O-Meter with feedback and with claims you'd like to see checked. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.