The Truth-O-Meter Says:
American Action Network

Ed Perlmutter voted for "Viagra for rapists" paid for with tax dollars.

American Action Network on Thursday, October 21st, 2010 in a campaign ad

Ed Perlmutter voted for Viagra for sex offenders, paid for by health care bill? Nope

A new campaign ad makes the startling claim that the new health care law will pay for Viagra for rapists -- and that Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Colo., voted for the measure.

The ad shows two young women chatting online about the new health care bill. Here's how their conversation goes:

"Hey, you have to check out the article I just sent you. Apparently convicted rapists can get Viagra paid for by the new health care bill."

"Are you serious?"

"Yes. I mean, Viagra for rapists? With my tax dollars? And Congressman Perlmutter voted for it."

"Perlmutter voted for it?"

"Yup. I mean, what is going on in Washington?"

"In November, we need to tell Perlmutter to repeal it."

The ad is from American Action Network, a conservative advocacy group organized as a 501(c)4, which means it does not have to disclose its donors. Its chief executive officer is Norm Coleman, a former Republican Senator from Minnesota. Its president is Rob Collins, a former chief of staff to House Minority Whip Eric Cantor.

Perlmutter did vote in favor of final passage of the health care law. But did Perlmutter vote for Viagra for rapists? The short answer is no.

Here's the long version:

The health care law affects nearly every part of the health care system. It increases regulations for health insurance companies, reins in future costs in the Medicare program for seniors, expands the Medicaid program for the poor and creates new tax breaks so that individuals and small businesses can purchase insurance with partial government subsidies.

It's this last measure that health care opponents have connected back to Viagra for sex offenders. Starting in 2014, some people will get tax credits to help them buy insurance policies. The credits are available to anyone who qualifies by having an income of between 133 to 400 percent of the federal poverty level. For a family of four in 2010, that ranges from $29,327 to $88,200, and for a single person, it's $14,403 to $43,320. They'll have to buy their policies through government-sponsored exchanges, which will set rules so that insurers offer standardized policies.

During the final negotiations for the health care law in the Senate, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., pointed out that because anyone can qualify for the tax breaks, it's possible that sex offenders will buy insurance policies with government subsidies. And they might ask for and be prescribed Viagra. That means tax dollars will be subsidizing Viagra for sex offenders, Coburn concluded.

It's actually an issue that's come up before, though in a different context. In 2005, the federal government had to direct states to make sure that sex offenders were not being prescribed Viagra while on Medicaid, the government-run health insurance program for the poor. (Press reports indicated it was happening.) During the 2010  debate, Coburn asked the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service about whether the health care law had any specific clause to prevent similar problems. The service issued a memo concluding that it did not.


So Coburn offered an amendment that would "reduce the cost of providing federally funded prescription drugs by eliminating fraudulent payments and prohibiting coverage of Viagra for child molesters and rapists and for drugs intended to induce abortion."

But by the time the Senate took up the amendment on March 24, 2010, it was late in the process. The bill's sponsors said any changes, no matter how small, could effectively kill the bill, so they opposed Coburn's amendment for procedural reasons. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., urged his colleagues to reject the amendment, saying, "This is a serious bill. This is a serious debate. The amendment offered by the senator from Oklahoma makes a mockery of the Senate, the debate and the American people... It is a crass political stunt aimed at making 30-second commercials, not public policy." The amendment failed, 57-42, and the president signed the law six days later. Now, nearly seven months later, the commercial has turned up.

We want to emphasize that the Viagra amendment came up in the Senate. Perlmutter is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. He never got the chance to vote one way or the other on the amendment. 

The Perlmutter campaign was not amused by the ad's claims, calling them "blatant lies."

"It's so illogical it would be like saying the bill allows Martians masquerading as humans to see a proctologist," said spokeswoman Leslie Oliver in a statement. 

American Action Campaign e-mailed a factsheet that says by virtue of voting for final passage for the health care bill that did not include the anti-Viagra amendment, he was voting for Viagra. The ad itself flashes an editorial from the Washington Times, headlined "Obamacare's Viagra giveaway." The editorial said the Senate should have voted for the Viagra amendment and questioned whether Democrats were sincere in their procedural objections.

We should note that the use of taxpayer dollars for sex-offender Viagra remains a hypothetical. While CRS concluded that there was nothing in the current law to stop it from happening, the earliest it could start is in 2014 -- so there's time for lawmakers to act or for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to write regulations to stop it from happening.

Finally, whatever taxpayer subsidies for sex offenders might materialize after 2014, they would not go to all sex offenders -- only to sex offenders who get health care through the exchanges and who also qualify for subsidies.

We've looked at similar claims made against U.S. senators and rated the claims Barely True. But this claim is different. The House never voted on the sex offenders amendment. Perlmutter never voted on it either. So we rate the statement the statement Pants on Fire.

Advertisement
About this statement:

Published: Tuesday, October 26th, 2010 at 7:02 p.m.

Subjects: Crime, Health Care, Message Machine 2010

Sources:

American Action Network, campaign ad on Viagra for sex offenders, Oct. 21, 2010

Perlmutter for Congress, 9 News AGAIN Reveals Lies Behind Latest Attack Ad on Perlmutter, accessed Oct. 26, 2010

The Denver Post, American Action Network e-mails reveal strategy, Oct. 21, 2010

Thomas, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, became law March 30, 3010

PolitiFact, Sharron Angle attacks Harry Reid over giving sex offenders taxpayer-subsidized Viagra, Oct. 8, 201

PolitiFact Texas, "GOP chair says the health care law provides free Viagra for convicted rapists and sex offenders," June 1, 2010

U.S. Senate, roll call vote on the motion to table Coburn amendment no. 3556, March 24, 2010

Text of Coburn Amendment no. 3556

Memo from the Congressional Research Service to Sen. Tom Coburn, Re: coverage under a qualified health plan for drugs prescribed to treat erectile dysfunction in the case of a convicted rapist, child molester or sex offender, April 2, 2010

Memo from the Congressional Research Service to Sen. Tom Coburn, Re: News articles on federal coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs for sex offenders, April 2, 2010

FactCheck.org, "Benton’s Bogus Viagra Ad," May 11, 2010

Roll Call, "CRS: Health law may allow Viagra coverage for sex offenders," April 7, 2010

Politico, "Dems reject amendment to ban Viagra for sex offenders," March 24, 2010

Kaiser Family Foundation, Summary of coverage provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, modified March 23, 2010

Kaiser Family Foundation, Explaining health care reform: questions about health insurance exchanges, April 2010





 

Written by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Researched by: Angie Drobnic Holan
Edited by: Martha M. Hamilton

How to contact us:

We want to hear your suggestions and comments.

For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e-mail the Obameter. If you are commenting on a specific promise, please include the wording of the promise.

For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or Flip-O-Meter items, please e-mail the Truth-O-Meter. We’re especially interested in seeing any chain e-mails you receive that you would like us to check out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume you don't mind us publishing it unless you tell us otherwise.

Browse The Truth-O-MeterTM:
Subscribe: