Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Is President Barack Obama focusing on climate change to the detriment of today’s (and tomorrow’s) weather? Freshman Rep. Jim Bridenstine, R-Okla., thinks so.
During a House floor speech on June 11, 2013, Bridenstine said he’s ready to accept Obama’s "apology" for spending too much on climate change research.
"Here’s what we absolutely know," Bridenstine said. "We know that Oklahoma will have tornadoes when the cold jet stream meets the warm gulf air. And we also know that this president spends 30 times as much money on global warming research as he does on weather forecasting and warning. For this gross misallocation, the people of Oklahoma are ready to accept the president’s apology, and I intend to submit legislation to fix this.
We wondered whether Bridenstine is right that Obama spends 30 times as much on global warming research as on weather forecasting and warning.
We discovered two key problems with his calculation. First, he didn’t count all the money that goes to "weather forecasting and warning." Second, he didn’t count all the research on weather he could have; that narrows the ratio as well.
See original Truth-O-Meter item.