Stand up for the facts!
Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.
I would like to contribute
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester) is a member of the budget committee, which was left without a witness last week when the state treasurer did not show up to explain some numbers.
Gov. Chris Christie said the Democrats were trying to put on a "political show" by calling the treasurer.
Burzichelli said the hearing was not theater. Rather, he said, the governor’s projections for state revenue collections, which are lagging, matter.
"Remember the governor is going around the state talking about [how] we should fund an income tax cut that will affect the higher earners in New Jersey in a higher way than it will the low earners, which will have no benefit for that," Burzichelli said in a Sept. 19 interview on NJToday.
Burzichelli then said the Legislature indicated that if Christie’s revenue projections were met, the Democrats would support some sort of tax cut.
"So as the numbers tell us they’re not materializing as he anticipated they would," Burzichelli said, "the ability to do a tax cut for the higher earners become[s] less and less likely and that’s why I think that we have to have these kind of hearings now."
Is Christie traveling the state touting a tax cut plan that only benefits wealthy residents?
The governor started a tour this summer to push for a tax cut, but Burzichelli unfairly characterizes Christie’s current plan.
In January, Christie proposed a tax cut that would have largely benefited wealthy individuals, but the governor has since embraced a new plan.
Christie’s original plan called for cutting income tax rates 10 percent across-the-board over three years. Under that proposal, residents who earn more -- and pay more in income taxes -- would have saved more, though lower income individuals would still have benefited.
But that plan is off the table. This summer Christie introduced a new proposal that excludes some of the state’s wealthiest residents.
The new plan, based on a proposal from the Senate Democrats, gives homeowners an income tax credit based on the first $10,000 of their property tax bill.
Only homeowners with $400,000 or less in taxable income could qualify for the 10 percent credit, which would be phased in over four years and reach a maximum of $1,000.
This summer, Christie, through his conditional veto power, took a bill that would have raised the top tax rate on millionaires and amended the language to turn it into his new tax cut plan.
Christie then urged the state Legislature to pass that amended legislation in a special session on July 2. They refused, saying it was prudent to wait to see whether the governor’s optimistic revenue projections were met before they committed to any tax cut.
Burzichelli acknowledged that Christie backed off the across-the-board income tax cut plan in his conditional veto, "if you take that snapshot," but he said, "I think he’s drifted back and forth a couple times."
We found no evidence to support that.
Both of Christie’s plans also would restore a cut he made in 2010 to the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit, a program that benefits lower income individuals. The plans would have increased the state credit to 25 percent of the federal credit amount, up from 20 percent.
Burzichelli said, "the governor is going around the state talking about [how] we should fund an income tax cut" that benefits higher income earners and not lower income earners.
Christie originally proposed an across-the-board income tax cut that would have benefited wealthy individuals more than those with lower-incomes, but he has since backed off that plan.
His new proposal is based on the property tax burden of homeowners and excludes residents with incomes more than $400,000.
We rate Burzichelli’s statement False.
To comment on this ruling, go to NJ.com.
NJToday, Burzichelli Defends Budget Hearing as Christie Continues to Tout Tax Cut, Sept. 19, 2012
Interview with Assemblyman John Burzichelli, Sept. 20, 2012
E-mail interview with Tom Hester, spokesman for Assembly Democrats, Sept. 20, 2012
PolitiFact New Jersey, Barbara Buono says Chris Christie embarked on a tour to demand the state Legislature approve a tax cut that disproportionately benefits the wealthiest people, Sept. 2, 2012
NorthJersey.com, Governor presses for income tax cut, July 26, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Gov. Christie proposes 10 percent N.J. income tax reduction, Jan. 17, 2012
New Jersey Governor’s Office, Tax Relief For All New Jerseyans, Jan. 17, 2012
PolitiFact New Jersey, Lou Greenwald claims governor’s proposed income tax cut benefits millionaires more than middle-class families, Jan. 22, 2012
RealReliefNJ.net, Property Tax Relief for Middle Class New Jersey, accessed Aug. 28, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Gov. Christie offers compromise tax cut at special Legislature session, July 2, 2012
New Jersey Governor’s Office, Conditional veto of Assembly Bill A-3201, July 2, 2012
New Jersey Governor’s Office, Governor Christie Calls Special Session To Make Case for Middle-Class Tax Cut, June 30, 2012
The Star-Ledger, At town hall meeting, Christie pitches agenda of tax cuts and reform, Sept. 13, 2012
The Star-Ledger, N.J. revenue collections far behind Gov. Christie's projections, figures show, Sept. 19, 2012
The Associated Press, Expert: NJ possibly facing mid-year budget cuts, Sept. 19, 2012
New Jersey 101.5, Governor Chris Christie Discusses Property Tax Caps and More on the Jim Gearhart Show, Sept. 19, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Gov. Christie to push for immediate tax relief effort during Shore visit, July 16, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Gov. Christie slams N.J.'s tax climate, while critics blast his Jersey Shore tour, July 16, 2012
The Star-Ledger, Analysis: Christie's proposed N.J. income tax cut would largely benefit state's wealthier residents, Jan. 31, 2012
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.