Stand up for the facts!
Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.
I would like to contribute
This election cycle, we’ve seen vulnerable Senate Democrats attacked by the billionaire Koch brothers in costly TV ad spots. It’s safe to say, though, that Democrats are fighting back.
Take the Senate Majority PAC, an outside group formed in 2011 to support Democratic Senate candidates. They launched a statewide ad in Arkansas attacking Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., who’s up against Democratic incumbent Mark Pryor come November.
"Corporate special interests are spending millions to smear Mark Pryor and elect Tom Cotton," the narrator said. "Why? Before Congress, Cotton got paid handsomely working for insurance companies and corporate interests."
PolitiFact wanted to know if Cotton really worked for insurance companies before taking office in 2013. Cotton’s campaign didn’t respond to our requests for comment.
What most people know about Cotton’s work experience is the years he spent serving in Afghanistan and Iraq from 2005 to 2009. That experience has come under fire from Pryor, who accused his opponent of having a "sense of entitlement" about his decorated military past.
Shortly after Cotton’s honorable discharge from the military, he worked at a global consulting firm called McKinsey & Company. The firm employs 17,000 people across 60 countries. Democrats like Chelsea Clinton and Susan Rice have also worked there.
The Senate Majority PAC pointed us to Cotton’s Facebook biography, which says, "As a businessman, Tom has advised some of America’s most respected companies on business strategy, operations, finance, and marketing. His industry experience includes agribusiness, health care, oil and gas, food processing, insurance, and aerospace."
That’s not work directly for an insurance company. And Glenn Kessler, our Washington Post fact-checking colleague, noted that Cotton has never even worked for an insurance company in a consulting role. Cotton worked on an assignment with the Federal Housing Authority to improve insurance offered to lenders who finance apartment buildings in the government’s multifamily housing programs, according to a statement from his former boss.
So Cotton didn’t work for an insurance company. But did he get paid handsomely? That’s a subjective judgment we won’t weigh in on. But we can see from his financial disclosure statement that Cotton earned $85,000 from McKinsey in 2011. For comparison, he makes $174,000 per year in Congress.
The Senate Majority PAC ad claimed, "Before Congress, Cotton got paid handsomely working for insurance companies and corporate interests." Cotton’s never worked for an insurance company, nor has he served as a consultant for one. We rate the statement False.
ABC, "Sen. Pryor hit for saying foe -- a decorated vet -- has ‘sense of entitlement,’ " March 5, 2014
Congressional Research Service, "Congressional salaries and allowances," Jan. 7, 2014
Daily Caller, "Dems attack Tom Cotton’s bio. But is it true?" March 27, 2014
Email interview with Sarah Mulligan, McKinsey & Company spokeswoman, April 8, 2014
Email interview with Ty Matsdorf, Senate Majority PAC spokesman, April 8, 2014
Facebook, Tom Cotton’s biography, accessed April 8, 2014
OpenSecrets, Tom Cotton’s financial disclosure statement, July 29, 2011
Politico, "For Tom Cotton, army was good training," Jan. 17, 2013
Politico, "Senate Majority PAC up in Arkansas, Michigan," March 28, 2014
Senate Majority PAC, "Connect the dots," April 2, 2014
Tom Cotton, "Washington Post, other news outlets call anti-Cotton ad claims ‘as phony as a three-dollar bill," April 1, 2014
Washington Post, "A Democratic attack ad tries to connect the dots, and earns 4 Pinocchios," April 1, 2014
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.