Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.

Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Lauren Carroll
By Lauren Carroll September 1, 2015

Obama's words and actions on climate don't match, activist video says

President Barack Obama is playing an environmental joke on us, according to a video by progressive activist group Credo Action.

This week, Obama traveled to Alaska to promote his climate change agenda. But some environmental activists see the visit as hypocritical, considering some of his other policy decisions, such as permitting oil drilling in the Arctic. To highlight what it sees as contradictory policies, Credo Action released an annotated version of a White House video promoting the Alaska trip.

Credo’s video says Obama’s trip is antithetical to some of his own policies, including "proposing to mine another 10 billion tons of Wyoming coal, which would unleash three times more carbon pollution than Obama's Clean Power Plan would even save through 2030."

Credo is right that mining 10 billion tons of coal in quick order would more than negate any carbon reductions from Obama’s EPA plan.

There’s just one problem: There’s no proposal to mine 10 billion tons of coal.

What proposal?

Credo’s source is a 2015 report by Greenpeace, another progressive environmental activist group. The report references the federal coal lease program, by which the government leases public lands to private companies for coal mining.

The report said that a field office of the Bureau of Land Management in Buffalo, Wy., is proposing several new leases that would amount to 10.2 billion tons of coal. Greenpeace estimated that burning all 10.2 billion tons would result in almost 17 billion tons of carbon pollution.

That dwarfs what the Environmental Protection Agency says Obama's Clean Power Plan will cut in carbon emissions. According to the EPA, the Clean Power Plan will reduce carbon emissions in the power sector by about 870 million tons annually by 2030. Greenpeace used a National Resources Defense Council estimate of the cumulative emission reductions through 2030 -- 5.3 billion tons.

Greenpeace’s carbon pollution calculation is reasonable, said Michael Mann, executive director of the Institute for Energy Studies at the University of North Dakota. Roughly 2.4 pounds of carbon are produced per pound of subbituminous coal (found in Wyoming) burned.

The problem is that this 10.2 billion new tons of coal proposal is nonexistent. Greenpeace -- and others who have quoted this figure -- are distorting a single line buried in a 3,000-page report.

In May 2015, the Wyoming field office released a resource management plan, which says the bureau "has estimated that it would issue 28 coal leases encompassing 106,400 acres with approximately 10.2 billion tons of coal...over the next 20 years."

But this is not a proposal or prediction. This is an outer-bounds estimate generated solely for the purposes of analysis, bureau spokeswoman Kristen Lenhardt told PolitiFact. The figures refer to the maximum amount of development possible within the 20-year lifespan of the resource management plan. The many regulatory steps that happen before land is offered for a coal lease, as well as shifts in market demand, would affect the actual amount of land available.

"It was not a plan for how much coal may, or may not be, leased in future years," she said. "It is highly unlikely that actual development during the period of the plan will be anywhere close to this number of leases or acres."

Also noteworthy is the fact that the resource management plan did not designate any new lands for coal lease consideration. These 106,400 acres identified by the report were already categorized as lands that could be available for mining.

Even if this were a real proposal, Credo’s timeline is unrealistic. It assumes that all 10 billion tons of Wyoming coal would be burned by 2030, which would require a staggering increase in coal use. The country has consumed around 1 billion tons of coal annually in recent years, and that’s including coal produced all over the country, not just Wyoming.

There are not nearly enough power plants in the country for this to work, Mann said. The United States has fewer than 520 coal-fired plants, and that number is on the decline.

"If we replaced all of the coal that is currently burned with this new coal from Wyoming, we still would not use that much coal," Mann said.

Our ruling

A video by Credo Action said the Obama administration is "proposing to mine another 10 billion tons of Wyoming coal, which would unleash three times more carbon pollution than Obama's Clean Power Plan would even save through 2030."

Burning 10 billion tons of coal over the next 15 years would unleash more carbon pollution than the federal clean energy regulations expect to save in the same period of time.

However, burning that much coal in that timeframe is unrealistic, and, more importantly, the government has not made such a proposal. Rather, the 10 billion tons figure refers to an estimate -- developed solely for analysis -- of the maximum amount of coal that could be available for mining in a particular region of Wyoming over the next 20 years.

Credo’s statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.

Correction, Sept. 8, 2015: We revised the explanation of Greenpeace's estimate of the Clean Power Plan's emission reductions by 2030 to reflect that the organization's estimate is cumulative over 15 years, while the EPA's estimate is annual.

Our Sources

Credo Action, "Climate Leaders Don't Drill The Arctic," Aug. 26, 2015

Greenpeace, "Leasing Coal, Fueling Climate Change," updated 2015

Bureau of Land Management -- Buffalo field office, "Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement," May 2015

Energy Information Administration, Coal databases, accessed Sept. 1, 2015

EIA, "Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan," May 22, 2015

WBUR "Here and Now," "The Future Of Wyoming Coal," June 10, 2015

University of Wyoming, "Potential Impacts on Wyoming Coal Production of EPA GHG Proposals," May 15, 2015

Bloomberg News, "Obama’s Clean Power Plan Seen Wiping Out High-Cost Coal," Aug. 3, 2015

Reuters, "Obama Issues Challenge on Climate Change With Power Plant Rule," Aug. 11, 2015

New York Times, "5 Questions About Obama’s Climate Change Plan," Aug. 3, 2015

EPA, "Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants," Aug. 3, 2015

EPA, "Obama Administration Takes Historic Action on Climate Change/Clean Power Plan," Aug. 3, 2015

Bureau of Land Management, "Coal Operations," Aug. 22, 2014

Email interview, Credo Action spokesman Josh Nelson, Aug. 31, 2015

Email interview, BLM spokeswoman Kristen Lenhardt, Aug. 31, 2015

Email interview, EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones, Aug. 31, 2015

Email interview, White House spokeswoman Noreen Nielsen, Aug. 31, 2015

Email interview, Michael Mann, executive director of the University of North Dakota’s Institute for Energy Studies, Sept. 1, 2015

Email interview, Diana Hulme, deputy director of research at the School of Energy Resources at the University of Wyoming, Sept. 1, 2015

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Lauren Carroll

Obama's words and actions on climate don't match, activist video says

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up