Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
Sen. Claire McCaskill and Attorney General Josh Hawley have traded allegations of being cozy with dark money — political money with an unknown source — during their Senate contest. McCaskill has tied Hawley to Citizens United, the group behind the famous Supreme Court case that redefined rules for campaign finance.
"The people who got unlimited anonymous money from corporations into elections is a group called Citizens United," McCaskill said during a Q&A on Sept. 10 at Truman State University. "My opponent is endorsed by Citizens United. He is all down for the dark money."
We decided to investigate the claim.
Citizens United is an interest group for conservative causes.
According to its website, Citizens United performs a number of functions — including production of documentaries pushing conservative ideas, advocacy campaigns for issues and contributions to candidates.
The 2010 Citizens United vs. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court decision established corporations as people and money as speech. PolitiFact wrote in 2010: "While corporations are still barred from giving directly to federal candidates, they are no longer forced to create political action committees in order to spend money on electioneering. A corporation, the justices held, may simply spend funds from its own accounts."
The Citizens United Political Victory Fund has donated $10,000 to Hawley’s Senate campaign (two $5,000 donations), per its website and FEC data.
David Bossie, the president of Citizens United, wrote an op-ed favoring Hawley’s 2016 attorney general bid in USA Today entitled "Josh Hawley for Attorney General."
"I was proud to be an early supporter of Josh Hawley for Attorney General and will support him again in his race for the Senate," Bossie wrote in a Fox News story published Oct. 23, 2017. The story detailed his support for a variety of conservative Senate candidates. Bossie was adamant that he hoped Hawley, someone he sees as outside the Republican establishment, would triumph over McCaskill, and he was particularly impressed with Hawley’s "fine work fighting for religious liberty in the Hobby Lobby case at the U.S. Supreme Court."
Hawley campaign spokeswoman Kelli Ford pointed out that McCaskill has benefitted from the dark money that she decried. In another fact-check, we found that dark money group Majority Forward has spent nearly $3 million opposing Hawley.
McCaskill said, "My opponent is endorsed by Citizens United."
Campaign donations and writing from the group’s president confirm the statement.
We rate the statement True.
Email conversation with Kelli Ford, 10/12
Email conversation with Eric Mee, 10/10
"Hawley vs. McCaskill: A sideshow battle of billionaire donors," Chuck Raasch, St. Louis Post Dispatch
"Messenger: Why is mega-donor investing in Missouri AG candidate? Check the court records." Tony Messenger, St. Louis Post Dispatch
"Citizens United is fueling outsider candidates," Cory Manento, Vox.com
"Dark money group launches ad campaign supporting McCaskill days after she pans dark money," Bryan Lowry, Kansas City Star
"The Real Reason Hillary Clinton Wants To Overturn 'Citizens United'," George Leef, Forbes.com
"What is political 'dark money' — and is it bad?" Michael Beckel, Center for Public Integrity
"Josh Hawley for Attorney General," David Bossie, USA Today
"McCaskill answers questions at Truman State University," Jason Hunsicker, Columbia Daily Tribune
"Conservative Senate candidates are ready to take on the Establishment in 2018," David Bossie, Foxnews.com
"Red state Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill faces Trump barrage as she opposes Kavanaugh nomination,"Jacob Pramuk, John W. Schoen, cnbc.com
Citizens United website, "Who we are"
Citizens United website, "What we do"
"Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission," scotusblog.com
"Why Alito shook his head: Obama exaggerates impact of Supreme Court ruling on on foreign companies," Louis Jacobson, PolitiFact.com
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.