Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
When Sen. Sherrod Brown spoke at a Youngstown senior center against a Republican proposal to convert Medicare to a voucher system, the National Republican Senatorial Committee had a ready response.
The NRSC revised and reissued a three-day-old news release that targeted virtually identical statements at Brown, of Ohio, and four other senators who all are Democrats up for re-election next year: Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Jon Tester of Montana, Ben Cardin of Maryland and Bill Nelson of Florida.
"Despite Sherrod Brown's transparent political strategy to mislead Ohio seniors and demagogue Medicare, this serves as another reminder he is the only candidate in Ohio who has voted to cut Medicare by over $500 billion in order to fund government-run health care," said NRSC spokesman Jahan Wilcox.
Wilcox cited the New York Times, Washington Post and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as supporting sources.
PolitiFact has examined at least four previous claims that the health care reform bill -- formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and informally tagged as Obamacare -- would cut Medicare by $500 billion.
The important point in each examination is that $500 billion -- the figure confirmed by the NRSC's citations -- are not taken out of the current Medicare budget and are not actual cuts. Nowhere in the bill are benefits actually eliminated, experts said.
The $500 billion are reductions to future spending. The health care law attempts to slow the projected growth in Medicare spending by that amount over 10 years.
Medicare spending will still increase. The Congressional Budget Office estimated it will reach $929 billion in 2020, up from $499 billion in actual spending in 2009.
Some of the changes in the health care law increase Medicare spending "to improve benefits and coverage, Tricia Neuman, director of the Medicare Policy Project at the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation told PolitiFact.
Other provisions reduce the growth in Medicare spending by helping the program operate more efficiently and fund coverage expansions to the uninsured. Other provisions are designed to improve the delivery of care and quality of care, she said.
The projected $500 billion in savings will come from changes that include higher insurance premiums for wealthier seniors, reductions in payments for Medicare Advantage plans, a new panel to oversee reimbursement rates, and a slowing of increases in payment rates to hospitals and other service providers each year. (Neuman explains the changes in a video tutorial on the Kaiser Family Foundation's website.)
The NRSC recycled another talking point when it further asserts that the changes in the health care law will "fund government-run health care."
PolitiFact has repeatedly issued Truth-O-Meter ratings of False or Pants on Fire for claims that the law represents a government takeover of health care. The claim was selected as PolitiFact National's 2010 Lie of the Year.
We found that critics of the law are correct that it significantly increases government regulation of health insurers. But it is, as noted previously, a system that relies on private companies:
- Employers continue to provide health insurance to the majority of Americans through private insurance companies.
- More people will get private health coverage. The law sets up "exchanges" where private insurers will compete to provide coverage to people who don't have it.
- The government will not seize control of hospitals or nationalize doctors.
- The law does not include a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers.
- The law gives tax credits to people who have difficulty affording insurance, so they can buy their coverage from private providers on the exchange.
The NRSC’s claim cites a real figure -- $500 billion -- that is part of the health reform debate. But it incorrectly describes it as $500 billion in Medicare cuts, rather than as decreases in the rate of growth of future spending.
And the NRSC piles on the incorrect talking point about "government-run health care."
On the Truth-Meter, the NRSC’s claim rates as False.
Youngstown Business Journal Daily, "Brown, Senior Advocates Blast GOP Plan," June 2, 2011
National Republican Senatorial Committee, "NRSC Fact Check: Brown Cut $500 Billion From Medicare," June 6, 2011
E-mail from NRSC, Jahan Wilcox, June 9, 2011
Associated Press, "Senators tell Biden to reject GOP Medicare plan," June 6, 2011
PolitiFact, "Medicare 'cuts' in the health care law will hurt seniors, says 60 Plus Association," Sept. 20 2010
The Kaiser Family Foundation, "Health Reform and Medicare: Overview of Key Provisions," July 2010
PolitiFact, "Obama claims Medicare benefits will not be cut under the health care bill," August 14, 2009
PolitiFact Oregon, "Scott Bruun says Kurt Schrader cut $500 billion from Medicare, hurting seniors," Oct. 2, 2010
PolitiFact Ohio, "Rep. Jim Renacci characterizes Medicare savings in health reform law as cuts," Feb. 2, 2011
PolitiFact Florida, "Mike Haridopolos takes on health care bill in newspaper op-ed,"
June 10, 2011
PolitiFact, "Cookie-cutter ads from coast to coast," Oct. 19, 2010
PolitiFact, "The (false) talking point that simply won't die," May 16, 2011
PolitiFact, "Romney calls Obama's health care law a government takeover," May 13 2011
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.