Stand up for the facts!
Misinformation isn't going away just because it's a new year. Support trusted, factual information with a tax deductible contribution to PolitiFact.
I would like to contribute
As medical marijuana heads to the ballot in Florida in November, opponents like Senate President Don Gaetz have argued that it will be too easy for people who want to smoke pot recreationally to get their hands on it.
"The ballot initiative is the legalization of marijuana," said Gaetz in an interview on Florida Face to Face on Feb. 13, 2014. "It doesn’t require a physician writing a prescription and it can be for purposes as specious as having a back that needs to be scratched. That’s the legalization of marijuana that I oppose and will vote against in November."
We’ve already fact-checked claims about the initiative, and there’s some merit to the argument that people will be able to get medical marijuana for a wide variety of conditions. But Gaetz’s claim about physicians struck us as suspicious, so we decided to check it out.
Would patients need a prescription?
In a 4-3 ruling in late January, the Florida Supreme Court paved the way for the amendment about medical marijuana to appear on the November ballot.
The ballot summary mentions doctors right off the bat:
"Allows the medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating diseases as determined by a licensed Florida physician. Allows caregivers to assist patients’ medical use of marijuana. The Department of Health shall register and regulate centers that produce and distribute marijuana for medical purposes and shall issue identification cards to patients and caregivers. Applies only to Florida law. Does not authorize violations of federal law or any non-medical use, possession or production of marijuana."
But if you read further into the amendment text, you’ll see that technically patients wouldn’t get a "prescription."
Instead, patients will need a "physician certification," which the amendment text states means "a written document signed by a physician, stating that in the physician‘s professional opinion, the patient suffers from a debilitating medical condition, that the potential benefits of the medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the health risks for the patient, and for how long the physician recommends the medical use of marijuana for the patient. A physician certification may only be provided after the physician has conducted a physical examination of the patient and a full assessment of the patient‘s medical history."
Robert Mikos, a Vanderbilt law school professor who specializes in drug policy, told PolitiFact Florida that there is a fine distinction between a certification (or a recommendation, as it’s commonly called in other medical marijuana states) and a prescription.
Doctors generally don’t "prescribe" marijuana, because in order for a physician to be allowed to prescribe narcotics, the doctor must register with the Drug Enforcement Agency. If the practitioner were to prescribe a Schedule I drug like marijuana -- which means under federal guidelines it is a dangerous narcotic, with no approved medical uses -- they would lose their registration, and would legally no longer be allowed to prescribe drugs.
On the other hand, a 2002 federal court decision did find that a doctor could simply recommend the drug, protecting the discussion with their patient under First Amendment protections of freedom of speech.
"In the legally relevant sense, it’s no different than a doctor recommending jogging every day," Mikos said. The certification in practice would largely be a piece of paper documenting the discussion, and would create a paper trail similar to a prescription, in order to track who is getting the drug and why.
Once a patient gets that certification, the Department of Health will issue the patient an identification card, according to the ballot language. Under the Florida law, patients would not be able to grow their own plants.
Approved patients could purchase marijuana from registered, state-regulated centers. If the amendment passes, the Department of Health will set rules for how centers will operate.
What sort of conditions would be covered?
The amendment text lists a number of qualifying conditions for medical marijuana, including cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDs, Hepatitis C, ALS, Crohn’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis.
But as Gaetz’s spokeswoman Katie Betta noted, it also includes this language: "or other conditions for which a physician believes that the medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health risks for a patient."
The Supreme Court, in allowing the amendment to go forward, noted that conditions that qualified would be those that "cause impaired strength, weakness or enfeeblement." We’ve previously noted that the ballot language suggests marijuana could be recommended for conditions like muscle spasms, neck pain, back pain and menstrual cramps, because all those conditions could be described as "debilitating."
This means anyone who has a condition that weakens or enfeebles them could qualify to use marijuana if their physician indicated that their use of marijuana outweighed the potential health risks.
That would include a wide range of ailments, and Gaetz’s spokesperson defended his choice of words on those grounds.
"The president is making the point that the amendment is open-ended because it states that a physician can issue a certification allowing for the use of medical marijuana for any condition where the benefit could outweigh the risks. ..." Betta told PolitiFact in an email. "The Supreme Court’s ruling did not interpret the amendment for application and will not be bound by any interpretation that was advanced related to the ballot summary challenge."
Still, Gaetz seems to be going too far using an example of "a back that needs to be scratched." Certainly, chronic itching can be a serious condition, but Gaetz's implication is that a condition with a simple remedy could be used to qualify for marijuana. The ballot language sets a higher bar than that, noting that the condition must be "debilitating."
Gaetz said the medical marijuana ballot initiative "doesn’t require a physician writing a prescription, and it can be for purposes as specious as a back that needs to be scratched."
Because of federal law, doctors won’t be writing prescriptions. Instead they will write a certification after examining the patient, determining the patient would benefit from marijuana and how long the patient should use it. Gaetz’s statement suggests Floridians could get marijuana without a doctor being involved, but that’s not the case.
Gaetz’s claim that someone can get marijuana for having a back in need of scratching is also misleading. The ballot language says that a condition must be debilitating, which means it weakens the person. While many different types of conditions could qualify under this definition, a back that simply needed scratching wouldn't qualify.
We rate this claim Half True.
Florida Face to Face, Interview with Sen. President Don Gaetz and House Speaker Will Weatherford, Feb. 13, 2014
Florida Secretary of State, Constitutional amendment petition form
Tampa Bay Times, "Questions and answers about medical marijuana in Florida," Jan. 28, 2014
Miami Herald’s Naked Politics blog, "Medical marijuana headed to ballot after Supreme’s 4-3 decision," Jan. 27, 2014
PolitiFact, "Fact-checking 7 claims about marijuana," Jan. 31, 2014
PolitiFact, "Pam Bondi says amendment would make Florida one of the most lenient medical marijuana states," Dec. 17, 2013
Americans for Safe Access, "Conant v. Walters," accessed Feb. 20, 2014
Interview, Robert Mikos, Vanderbilt University Law School professor, Feb. 20, 2014
Interview, Katie Betta, spokeswoman for Sen. Don Gaetz, Feb. 20, 2014
Interview, Sheri Hutchinson, spokeswoman Florida Department of Health, Feb. 20, 2014
Interview, Ben Pollara, campaign manager United for Care, Feb. 20, 2014
Interview, Morgan Fox, spokesman Marijuana Policy Project, Feb. 20, 2014
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.