Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
Presidential hopeful Marco Rubio is taking credit for potentially sounding the death knell for Obamacare, claiming legislation he introduced eventually prevented Washington from giving billions of tax dollars to insurance companies.
"Last year, I stopped an Obamacare bailout and saved taxpayers $2.5 billion," Rubio said in a Dec. 1, 2015, tweet. It linked to a Fox News story giving Rubio credit for dealing a blow to President Barack Obama’s signature health care legislation.
Declaring he saved heaps of tax money and prevented a government bailout linked to a divisive law is a campaign coup for Rubio, who has risen to second among GOP candidates in the latest national Quinnipiac poll. But can he truly claim he kept billions from being used for a so-called bailout?
Risk corridors rundown
To set the table, we need to take a deep breath and go over a provision of the Affordable Care Act known as "risk corridors."
The ACA upended the traditional health insurance model of selling mostly to healthy people, mandating that insurers must provide policies to everyone, regardless of health or pre-existing conditions. That presented a problem for the companies, which didn’t know how much they would need to charge in premiums in order to cover their expenses for all the new policies.
To help companies stay solvent as they adjusted their rates to proper levels, the law provided a three-year period in which the government would spread the risk among all insurers in ACA marketplaces. This program, set to last between 2014-16, is known as risk corridors.
If some insurers are successful in setting their marketplace rates properly and make more than a certain amount, Washington gets some of that extra money, referred to as user fees. Companies that don’t do well have a portion of their losses covered by the government.
Rubio has opposed the risk corridors since 2013, introducing legislation in the Senate to repeal the program. His bill didn’t go anywhere, but Rubio continued to speak out against the provision, referring to the program as a "bailout" for unsuccessful insurance companies.
But is it really a bailout? Several experts told us no, stressing that a bailout usually refers to a program used to save a company after the fact, not a mechanism in place to deal with a problem that everyone assumes could occur.
The risk corridors program was modeled after a successful plan through Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage set up during George W. Bush’s presidency. The Part D program is a bit different than the ACA’s version, but it was still designed to spread risk among insurers.
"Then, no one called it a bailout, when a new private insurance market was being created for Medicare drug benefits," said Mark Hall, a law and public health professor at Wake Forest University.
But the problem with Obamacare’s risk corridors is really about how it’s funded. And that’s the heart of Rubio’s claim of saving taxpayer money.
The ACA did not specify where it was getting the money to cover any risk corridor payments. To get around this, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said they would keep the program budget-neutral by making payments strictly from the user fees successful insurers sent to the government.
Rubio’s concern has been that CMS promised in 2013 that "regardless of the balance of payments and receipts" in the program, insurers who said they needed money would get it. His point is that if there wasn’t enough money to cover the payments, the Obama administration would ask Congress for money.
But CMS said in April 2014 that it didn’t plan to ask Congress for an appropriation. If they didn’t take in enough money the first year, they would make it up in later years, when marketplaces hopefully stabilized enough to cover losses.
To make sure CMS didn’t ask for cash, Rubio wanted to cut off other sources of funding that could be used to pay off those companies. He urged then-Speaker of the House John Boehner in October 2014 to block potential appropriations for risk corridor payments.
When Congress passed a spending bill in December 2014, it included a sentence, or a "rider" in legislative speak, that said the CMS’ parent agency, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, could not move money around in its budget to pay extra risk corridor expenses. Other legislators have credited Rubio with inspiring this language. Rubio has since reintroduced his bill to repeal risk corridors.
Everyone had to wait until insurance companies turned in their results to see how the risk corridors were working. The first year didn’t go as well as CMS and the Obama administration had hoped. In October 2015, CMS announced the risk corridors program took in $362 million for 2014, while less successful insurers asked for a total of $2.87 billion.
That left a $2.5 billion shortfall CMS can’t pay.
CMS said it would pay out 12.6 percent of claims from 2014 this year, leading some insurers to leave the marketplaces or even collapse altogether. Rubio now is on the campaign trail trumpeting the move as potentially being "a big part of ending Obamacare for good."
Some legal observers, however, doubt whether Rubio’s efforts had any long-term effects.
"All the rider did is say, ‘If you’re going to go scrape the couch cushions for money to pay for this, don’t,’ " Nicholas Bagley, a University of Michigan law professor, told PolitiFact Florida. "The Rubio rider is preventing the administration from coming up with a workaround to a problem the law already had."
There are still two years left in the risk corridors program, which the Congressional Budget Office said will likely eventually break even. If the program is in the red after 2016, CMS will either have to somehow find the money or ask Congress to decide whether to approve cash to pay the bill. Otherwise insurers could potentially sue to get what the law says they’re owed.
"What he did is throw a wrench in the process," Bagley said of Rubio, who is trying to include the same kind of roadblock in the current spending bill. The deadline for that bill is Dec. 11. "It’s perfectly reasonable to assume those insurance companies are going to eventually want the money that was promised to them."
Rubio said, "Last year, I stopped an Obamacare bailout and saved taxpayers $2.5 billion."
He’s referring to a provision in the Affordable Care Act called risk corridors, which faced a $2.5 billion shortfall for 2014. Rubio, whose efforts to repeal risk corridors have so far failed, helped persuade Congress last year to prevent Health and Human Services from being able to cover the difference with money from its own budget.
But experts said calling the program a bailout is not accurate. They also noted CMS has said they want the risk corridors to pay for themselves through fees from insurers.
Most importantly, experts also said Rubio did not necessarily save that money in the long run. His best argument is he temporarily limited one way CMS could have tried to pay for insurance companies' losses. The program has two more years to cover its expenses. If any bills are due after that time, CMS or Congress will have to find a way to pay them because they are obligated to do so.
Rubio oversimplified a complex process that is still largely unresolved. We rate his statement Mostly False.
Marco Rubio, tweet, Dec. 1, 2015
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, letter to insurance commissioners, Nov. 14, 2013
Wall Street Journal, "Marco Rubio: No Bailouts for ObamaCare," Nov. 18, 2013
Sen. Marco Rubio, "Rubio Introduces Bill Preventing Taxpayer-Funded Bailouts Of Insurance Companies Under ObamaCare," Nov. 19, 2013
National Review, "The Obamacare Risk Corridors," Nov. 20, 2013
PunditFact, "Krauthammer: Obamacare has hidden insurance company bailout," Jan. 13, 2014
Congressional Budget Office, "Updated Estimates of the Effects of the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act," April 2014
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Risk Corridors and Budget Neutrality," April 11, 2014
PunditFact, "Carville: Insurance risk corridors aren't going broke like Republicans predicted," April 13, 2014
The Incidental Economist, "Does the risk corridor program have a fatal technical flaw?," May 1, 2014
Rep. Leonard Lance, "Effort to Stop Insurance Company Bailouts Gains Momentum," July 28, 2014
U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, "ObamaCare’s Taxpayer Bailout of Health Insurers and the White House’s Involvement to Increase Bailout Size," July 28, 2014
Sen. Marco Rubio, "Rubio, Colleagues To Boehner: We Must Protect Congressional Authority, Prohibit ObamaCare Bailout," Oct 8, 2014
Sen. Marco Rubio, letter to John Boehner, Oct. 8, 2014
New York Times, "Senate Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill, Joining House," Dec. 13, 2014
Sen. Marco Rubio, letter to Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, etc., Nov. 24, 2015
Sen. Marco Rubio, "Rubio Introduces Bill Preventing Taxpayer-Funded Bailouts Of Insurance Companies Under ObamaCare," Jan. 8, 2015
Sen. Bill Cassidy, "Cassidy, Rubio: No Obamacare Insurance Company Bailout," Feb. 4, 2015
The Hill, "GOP bill hits ObamaCare risk corridors," Feb. 5, 2015
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, "Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System: Sharing risk in Medicare Part D," June 2015
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "The Three Rs: An Overview," Oct. 1, 2015
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Risk Corridors Payment Proration Rate for 2014," Oct. 1, 2015
Sen. Marco Rubio, "Rubio Saves Taxpayers Over $2.5 Billion In Obamacare Bailout Funds, Calls For Taking Option Off The Table For Good," Oct. 2, 2015
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Risk Corridors Payments for the 2014 Benefit Year," Nov. 19, 2015
Washington Examiner, "Rubio to GOP congressional leaders: Let's stop Obamacare bailouts," Nov. 24, 2015
The Hill, "Rubio budget win is dealing heavy blow to ObamaCare," Nov. 24, 2015
Bloomberg Politics, "Marco Rubio Didn't 'Kill' Obamacare, But Here's How He Undermined It," Nov. 25, 2015
The Incidental Economist, "Did Marco Rubio Kill Obamacare?," Dec. 1, 2015
Quinnipiac University, "Bump For Trump As Carson Fades In Republican Race, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Clinton, Sanders Surge In Matchups With GOP Leaders," Dec. 2, 2015
MarcoRubio.com, "Marco Killed the Obamacare Bailout Once, Now He Wants It Dead For Good," accessed Dec. 2, 2015
MarcoRubio.com, "How Marco Saved Taxpayers $2.5 Billion on the ObamaCare Bailout — And Is Fighting to Save Them Much, Much More," accessed Dec. 2, 2015
Congress.gov, "S.1726 — Obamacare Taxpayer Bailout Prevention Act," accessed Dec. 2, 2015
U.S. Government Publishing Office, "H. R. 83—362, Sec. 227" accessed Dec. 2, 2015
Congress.gov, "S.123 — Obamacare Taxpayer Bailout Prevention Act," accessed Dec. 3, 2015
HealthAffairs.org, "Risk Corridors And Budget Neutrality," May 14, 2014
Fox News, "’Saved us money’: Rubio wins conservative cred for ObamaCare change," Dec. 1, 2015
Interview with Mark Hall, Wake Forest University law and public health professor, Dec. 2, 2015
Interview with Scott Harrington, University of Pennsylvania health care management professor, Dec. 2, 2015
Interview with Timothy Jost, Washington and Lee University law professor, Dec. 2, 2015
Interview with Jillian Cassidy, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., spokeswoman, Dec. 2, 2015
Interview with Aaron Albright, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services spokesman, Dec. 2, 2015
Interview with Nicholas Bagley, University of Michigan law professor, Dec. 3, 2015
Interview with Alex Burgos, Rubio spokesman, Dec. 3, 2015
Interview with Melinda Buntin, Vanderbilt University health policy professor, Dec. 3, 2015
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.