Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
Social Security beneficiaries beware: an e-mail hitting local inboxes claims President Barack Obama backs a scheme to tax your monthly check.
But the online missive falls short on facts.
"President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar," the e-mail, which was sent to PolitiFact New Jersey on May 12, said. "This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax charged."
"If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction," the e-mail claims.
Don’t empty your bank accounts and plan a life off the grid quite yet. Neither the president nor his financial team are recommending such a measure, PolitiFact New Jersey found. The idea comes from a Pennsylvania congressman’s proposal.
U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, a Democrat, first advanced the concept in the House in 2004 when he introduced a bill that would have required a study on eliminating all federal taxes on individuals and corporations and replacing that revenue stream with transaction fees.
The bill had no co-sponsors and died in committee. Fattah introduced similar legislation several times after his first attempt calling for a study. Only one of those bills gained a co-sponsor, but none of them made it out of committee.
In 2010, Fattah ditched the calls for a study and introduced a bill -- called the "Debt Free America Act" -- to implement a one-percent transaction fee on "any transaction that uses a payment instrument, including any check, cash, credit card, transfer of stock, bonds, or other financial instrument." Any transactions involving stocks were excluded from the fee.
With the fee, the bill "intended to raise sufficient revenue to eliminate the national debt" and "phase out the income tax on individuals."
The Debt Free America Act is the legislation the e-mail claims Obama and his financial team are recommending, though it’s the work of one congressman and the proposal never left committee.
Since the e-mail, a version of which PolitiFact Rhode Island deemed Pants on Fire in November 2010, started circulating, Fattah reintroduced the legislation.
The most recent bill, introduced in March 2011, still applies a one-percent transaction fee, but excludes personal bank account transactions in addition to transactions involving stocks.
It has no co-sponsors and was again referred to committee, where it remains.
An e-mail claims that the president’s finance team recommends a "1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution."
That’s ridiculous. A Pennsylvania congressman has sponsored a bill that would levy a one-percent fee on some financial transactions. But nearly every year he has introduced the legislation it gained no support. And none of the bills have ever left committee.
Obama -- and his financial team -- have nothing to do with the legislation.
We set this e-mail claim ablaze. Pants on Fire!
To comment on this story, go to NJ.com.
Chain e-mail, received May 12, 2012
PolitiFact Oregon, E-mail claims DeFazio wants to tax everyday banking transactions, Oct. 1, 2010
PolitiFact Rhode Island, E-mail claims Obama's finance team wants a 1-percent tax on every banking transaction, Nov. 12, 2010
FactCheck.org, 1% Transaction Tax, Sept. 8, 2010
Snopes.com, The One Percent Solution, Feb. 14, 2012
U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, The Debt Free America Act, accessed May 14, 2012
Congressman Chaka Fattah, Debt Free America Act, accessed May 14, 2012
Congressman Chaka Fattah, Transform America Transaction Fee, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 108th Congress (2003 - 2004): H.R.3759, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 109th Congress (2005 - 2006): H.R.1601, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 110th Congress (2007 - 2008): H.R.2130, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 111th Congress (2009 - 2010): H.R.1703, accessed May 14, 2012
GPO.gov, H.R. 1601 (ih) - Comprehensive Transform America Transaction Fee Act of 2005, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 111th Congress (2009 - 2010): H.R.4646, accessed May 14, 2012
The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status: 112th Congress (2011 - 2012): H.R.1125, accessed May 14, 2012
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.