Rob Schmitt
stated on August 14, 2019 in a "Fox & Friends First" discussion:
Says the Trump administration’s new policy for legal immigrants on welfare "has been around for a while. This is not a new thing that the president is trying to implement here, that the United States has been this way."
true half-true
Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, during a briefing at the White House on Aug. 12, 2019. (AP/Vucci) Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, during a briefing at the White House on Aug. 12, 2019. (AP/Vucci)

Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, during a briefing at the White House on Aug. 12, 2019. (AP/Vucci)

Bill McCarthy
By Bill McCarthy August 15, 2019

What’s new in Trump’s policy for legal immigrants on welfare

The Trump administration recently announced a new rule broadening the government’s ability to deny visas and permanent residency to legal immigrants who get public benefits.

The rule, set to take effect on Oct. 15, is a new interpretation of an older immigration law and the latest effort by President Donald Trump to restrict certain types of immigration to the United States. But there’s some confusion over what this new rule will do and how drastic it is.

On the Aug. 14 episode of "Fox & Friends First," anchor Rob Schmitt moderated a discussion over the new policy, which he introduced as "changes to immigration laws that could deny green cards to migrants who need welfare in this country."

"This rule has been around for a while," he said at one point. "This is not a new thing that the president is trying to implement here, that the United States has been this way."

That made our ears perk up, so we decided to dig into the history of laws that zero in on those considered likely to become "public charges," or burdens to American taxpayers. 

Our finding: Schmitt’s statement is partially accurate. While a public charge law has been on the books for more than 100 years, the Trump administration’s broad interpretation of it is unprecedented. 

Fox News declined to comment.

Old law, new interpretation

Public charge laws are regulations that say immigrants to the United States can be turned away if they are likely to depend on public assistance programs. 

Schmitt is right that the public charge law is nothing new. But his claim that "this is not a new thing that the president is trying to implement" leaves out some important details.

"There is a long history of public charge law in this country, but the new regulation represents a big expansion in how this law is interpreted and applied," said Julia Gelatt, senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, a non-partisan think tank in Washington. "We have never before had such a broad interpretation in place of who might become a public charge."

A public charge law first appeared as part of the Immigration Act of 1882. Back then, immigrants generally had to show they had cash to spare and enough money to buy a ticket to their ultimate United States destination, Gelatt said.

The public charge rule was reaffirmed by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 and has held its place in the immigration system ever since. But for a long time, the law offered no clear definition for determining whether a person was a potential public charge.

Eventually, a 1996 bill said the Immigration and Naturalization Service should consider a person’s age, health, family status, financial resources, education, skills and ability to secure a sponsor’s written support when deciding if he or she would likely become a public charge.

In 1999, the INS clarified that the term "public charge" applied specifically to immigrants who were "primarily dependent" on government cash assistance or long-term, institutionalized care.

The Trump administration’s new rule expands that definition, experts told us, and it will affect hundreds of thousands of immigrants who come legally to the United States each year and apply to stay permanently. 

Once the rule goes into effect, immigration officials will be able to deny legal immigrants visas if they are deemed "more likely than not" to use public benefits such as Medicaid, food stamps or housing vouchers. Immigrants who are in the United States legally on temporary visas and have relied on such benefits in the past could also have more difficulty getting a green card.

The rule will not affect people who already have green cards, refugees and asylum-seekers, as well as certain members of the military, pregnant women and children.

The Trump administration has defended the move as preserving public benefits for eligible U.S. citizens and promoting self-sufficiency in immigrants to the United States.

But Gelatt said the rule could be used to deny many more green card applicants than before and, as a consequence, "have dramatic impacts on the level of legal immigration to the country, and on the characteristics of legal immigrants."

Kevin Johnson, dean of UC Davis School of Law, noted that the enforcement of immigration laws has already changed drastically under Trump. 

He said the number of visa denials for Mexican immigrants has "skyrocketed," pointing to a Politico report that said the State Department denied 5,343 visa requests from Mexican immigrants on public charge grounds between Oct. 1 and July 29.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services did not weigh in on the accuracy of Schmitt’s claim, but the agency’s press office told us: "Public charge has been a part of U.S. immigration law for more than 100 years, appearing as far back as the Immigration Act of 1882, as a ground of inadmissibility, and has existed in its current form since 1996."

Our ruling

Schmitt said, "This rule has been around for a while. This is not a new thing that the president is trying to implement here, that the United States has been this way."

Public charge as a standard of inadmissibility has been a staple of immigration law since 1882. But Trump’s new policy will significantly change the way immigration officials decide which legal immigrants should be disqualified from getting visas or green cards.

The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details. So we rate it Half True.

Our Sources

Media Matters for America, "Fox host: ‘Lady Liberty never promised welfare, if you look at the history of it,’" Aug. 14, 2019

C-Span, "Ken Cuccinelli Announces New Immigration Rule," Aug. 12, 2019

Federal Register, "Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds," Aug. 14, 2019

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, "Final Rule on Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility," Aug. 12, 2019

Government Publishing Office, "Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952", June 27, 1952

The University of Washington-Bothell Library, "Immigration Act of 1882", Aug. 3, 1882

Congress.gov, "Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996", Sept. 24, 1996

Federal Register, "Field Guidance on Deportability and Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds," March 26, 1999

The White House, "President Donald J. Trump is Ensuring Non-Citizens Do Not Abuse Our Nation’s Public Benefit," Aug. 12, 2019

The New York Times, "Trump Policy Favors Wealthier Immigrants for Green Cards," Aug. 12, 2019

Roll Call, "New ‘public charge’ rule could affect millions of immigrants," Aug. 12, 2019

Politico, "Exclusive: Visa denials to poor Mexicans skyrocket under Trump’s State Department," Aug. 6, 2019

Email interview with Kevin R. Johnson, immigration law expert and Dean of UC Davis School of Law, Aug. 14, 2019

Email interview with Julia Gelatt, senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, Aug. 14, 2019

Email interview with Rebecca Sharpless, professor of law and director of the immigration clinic at the University of Miami School of Law, Aug. 14, 2019

Statement from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Aug. 14, 2019

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Bill McCarthy

What’s new in Trump’s policy for legal immigrants on welfare

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up