Stand up for facts and support PolitiFact.
Now is your chance to go on the record as supporting trusted, factual information by joining PolitiFact’s Truth Squad. Contributions or gifts to PolitiFact, which is part of the 501(c)(3) nonprofit Poynter Institute, are tax deductible.
I would like to contribute
During a bilateral breakfast with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, President Donald Trump blasted the alliance’s other members over lagging contributions to NATO’s joint defense spending.
"Many countries are not paying what they should," Trump said. "And, frankly, many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back, where they’re delinquent, as far as I’m concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them."
This was not the first time Trump has demanded that NATO countries contribute more to the military alliance, and we have fact-checked similar statements before.
But the sweeping nature of this claim inspired us to take another look at one of the president’s oft-repeated complaints. As it turns out, Trump’s statement shows a misunderstanding of the way NATO spending works. Other member countries do not owe the United States or NATO any money.
Formally the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO was established in 1949 for the purpose of providing collective security against Soviet aggression and expansion. Ten European nations signed on to the original agreement along with the United States and Canada.
In signing the treaty, the original members agreed that "an armed attack against one or more of them … shall be considered an attack against them all" to which each member would respond by taking "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force."
NATO has swelled to 29 member countries with the stated purpose "to guarantee the freedom and security of its members through political and military means."
As of 2014, NATO’s collective agreement instructed member countries to spend 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense by 2024. According to NATO’s most recent report detailing members’ defense expenditures, only five countries currently satisfy that threshold: the United States, Greece, the United Kingdom, Estonia and Latvia.
But other countries still have several years to reach the target commitment, and for those experiencing significant economic growth, increases in defense spending may take some time to reflect change to the share of GDP.
Daniel Benjamin, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and professor at Dartmouth College with an expertise in foreign policy and security, noted that "the trend lines are going in the right direction" for many countries that are underspending at the moment.
The White House did not respond to a request to clarify this point. Several experts explained that the president was likely referring, albeit incorrectly, to the commitment to devote 2 percent of GDP to defense spending.
"It most certainly is not true, as the president has suggested repeatedly, that other NATO countries owe us money," said Christopher Preble, vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute. "The 2 percent figure refers to what each country spends on its defense, as a share of that country’s GDP. It does not imply owing the U.S. anything."
NATO countries do not pay money to a broad NATO defense budget. NATO defense spending is "not money that is going to be put in some kitty at NATO," Benjamin said.
In reality, each country determines its own level of military spending, said Ivo Daalder, president of the Chicago Council for Global Affairs and the former U.S. ambassador to NATO under former President Barack Obama.
"No one owes us any money," Daalder said. "Nor is the U.S. spending more because allies are spending less ... our defense spending is a national decision and is determined by our national security and defense needs."
"Countries falling short means not that they owe anyone money, but that countries have weaker militaries than we would like," added Stephen Saideman, a professor at Carleton University's Norman Paterson School of International Affairs. "NATO is not a country club."
Preble also noted that a more specific remark might have been slightly more accurate.
"If Donald Trump was claiming that the United States needed to spend more on the Pentagon because we have obligations under NATO to come to others’ defense, and those obligations are more onerous and thus costly because others are not spending enough on their defense, that would be more accurate," Preble said. "But he’s not saying that."
The United States does pay for approximately 22 percent of a small, commonly-funded budget that concerns civilian and some military expenses, Daalder noted. That budget, which is less than $5 billion, is funded by all NATO members based on a cost-sharing formula that considers gross national income and other factors.
But Daalder said "no one is in arrears or delinquent on any payments" for that budget, either.
Trump said that "many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back."
NATO members agreed to contribute at least 2 percent of their country’s GDP toward defense by 2024, but that defense spending does not take the form of payments to the United States or the alliance as a whole.
We rate this statement False.
The White House, "Remarks by President Trump and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at Bilateral Breakfast," July 11, 2018
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, "Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2011-2018)," March 15, 2018
PolitiFact, "Fact-check: Donald Trump says Germany owes 'vast sums of money to NATO,’" July 10, 2018
Email interview with Christopher Preble, vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, July 11, 2018
Email interview with Ivo Daalder, president of the Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs, July 11, 2018
Email interview with Stephen M. Saideman, Paterson Chair in International Affairs at Carleton University's Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, July 11, 2018
Email interview with Daniel Benjamin, Norman E. McCulloch Jr. Director of the John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding at Dartmouth College, July 11, 2018
Email correspondence with Mandy Smithberger, director of the Center for Defense Information’s Straus Military Reform Project, July 11, 2018
Email correspondence with Barry Blechman, co-founder at the Stimson Center, July 11, 2018
Email correspondence with William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy, July 11, 2018
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.